Patchwork [GIT,PULL] sunxi drivers additions for 3.10, take 1

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Maxime Ripard
Date March 23, 2013, 9:51 a.m.
Message ID <514D7B30.7080002@free-electrons.com>
Download mbox
Permalink /patch/230322/
State New
Headers show

Pull-request

git://github.com/mripard/linux.git tags/sunxi-drivers-for-3.10

Comments

Maxime Ripard - March 23, 2013, 9:51 a.m.
Arnd, Olof,

Please consider pulling the following pull request that contains
drivers to be included in 3.10. The only addition for now is the clock
driver for the Allwinner A10 and A13.

Thanks,
Maxime

The following changes since commit 6dbe51c251a327e012439c4772097a13df43c5b8:

  Linux 3.9-rc1 (2013-03-03 15:11:05 -0800)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://github.com/mripard/linux.git tags/sunxi-drivers-for-3.10

for you to fetch changes up to 6b7724033efb055b07902a2b0a689445ed31b37d:

  arm: sunxi: Add useful information about sunxi clocks (2013-03-23 09:36:58 +0100)

----------------------------------------------------------------
sunxi drivers additions for 3.10

----------------------------------------------------------------
Emilio López (2):
      clk: arm: sunxi: Add a new clock driver for sunxi SOCs
      arm: sunxi: Add useful information about sunxi clocks

 Documentation/arm/sunxi/clocks.txt                |   56 ++++
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt |   44 +++
 drivers/clk/Makefile                              |    1 +
 drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile                        |    5 +
 drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-factors.c                   |  180 ++++++++++
 drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-factors.h                   |   27 ++
 drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c                     |  362 +++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/clocksource/sunxi_timer.c                 |    4 +-
 include/linux/clk/sunxi.h                         |   22 ++
 9 files changed, 699 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/arm/sunxi/clocks.txt
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
 create mode 100644 drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile
 create mode 100644 drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-factors.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-factors.h
 create mode 100644 drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
 create mode 100644 include/linux/clk/sunxi.h
Arnd Bergmann - March 23, 2013, 10:06 a.m.
On Saturday 23 March 2013, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Please consider pulling the following pull request that contains
> drivers to be included in 3.10. The only addition for now is the clock
> driver for the Allwinner A10 and A13.
> 

Hi Maxime,

I see the patches have been Acked by Mike Turquette, so I assume he's
ok with getting them merged through the arm-soc tree, but I don't
actually see a reason why it shouldn't just go through his tree.
If there is something I'm missing, that is probably information
that belongs into the tag description.

I don't mind pulling this if there is a good reason, such as later
pull requests for 3.10 depending on it, but I'd prefer to not just
get a pull request for something that is not in my area without
an explanation why that is necessary, and without having the
real subsystem maintainer on Cc.

	Arnd
Maxime Ripard - March 23, 2013, 10:19 p.m.
Hi Arnd,

Le 23/03/2013 11:06, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
> On Saturday 23 March 2013, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> Please consider pulling the following pull request that contains
>> drivers to be included in 3.10. The only addition for now is the clock
>> driver for the Allwinner A10 and A13.
>>
> 
> Hi Maxime,
> 
> I see the patches have been Acked by Mike Turquette, so I assume he's
> ok with getting them merged through the arm-soc tree, but I don't
> actually see a reason why it shouldn't just go through his tree.
> If there is something I'm missing, that is probably information
> that belongs into the tag description.
> 
> I don't mind pulling this if there is a good reason, such as later
> pull requests for 3.10 depending on it, but I'd prefer to not just
> get a pull request for something that is not in my area without
> an explanation why that is necessary, and without having the
> real subsystem maintainer on Cc.

There will probably be further merge depending on this, but I don't
think there will be more than clock gates patches and some rework that I
plan to begin support for the next chip, so I'm fine with it going
through Mike's tree.

I just took it in my tree to avoid similar merge problems than the one
we encountered, and since I had to merge some of the patches in this
series...

Anyway, like I said, if you prefer to see this going through Mike's
tree, I'm fine with it.

Maxime