From patchwork Thu Mar 14 10:35:25 2013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Luis Henriques X-Patchwork-Id: 227569 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from huckleberry.canonical.com (huckleberry.canonical.com [91.189.94.19]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD122C0089 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:39:30 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=huckleberry.canonical.com) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UG5ZD-00072R-Vv; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:39:23 +0000 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UG5XE-0005zQ-W2 for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:37:20 +0000 Received: from bl15-242-192.dsl.telepac.pt ([188.80.242.192] helo=localhost) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UG5XE-0003ky-OP; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:37:20 +0000 From: Luis Henriques To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: [PATCH 32/88] xen/pci: We don't do multiple MSI's. Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:35:25 +0000 Message-Id: <1363257381-15900-33-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.1.2 In-Reply-To: <1363257381-15900-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> References: <1363257381-15900-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Extended-Stable: 3.5 Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk X-BeenThere: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Kernel team discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com Sender: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com 3.5.7.8 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk commit 884ac2978a295b7df3c4a686d3bff6932bbbb460 upstream. There is no hypercall to setup multiple MSI per PCI device. As such with these two new commits: - 08261d87f7d1b6253ab3223756625a5c74532293 PCI/MSI: Enable multiple MSIs with pci_enable_msi_block_auto() - 5ca72c4f7c412c2002363218901eba5516c476b1 AHCI: Support multiple MSIs we would call the PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq 'nvec' times with the same contents of the PCI device. Sander discovered that we would get the same PIRQ value 'nvec' times and return said values to the caller. That of course meant that the device was configured only with one MSI and AHCI would fail with: ahci 0000:00:11.0: version 3.0 xen: registering gsi 19 triggering 0 polarity 1 xen: --> pirq=19 -> irq=19 (gsi=19) (XEN) [2013-02-27 19:43:07] IOAPIC[0]: Set PCI routing entry (6-19 -> 0x99 -> IRQ 19 Mode:1 Active:1) ahci 0000:00:11.0: AHCI 0001.0200 32 slots 4 ports 6 Gbps 0xf impl SATA mode ahci 0000:00:11.0: flags: 64bit ncq sntf ilck pm led clo pmp pio slum part ahci: probe of 0000:00:11.0 failed with error -22 That is b/c in ahci_host_activate the second call to devm_request_threaded_irq would return -EINVAL as we passed in (on the second run) an IRQ that was never initialized. Reported-and-Tested-by: Sander Eikelenboom Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques --- arch/x86/pci/xen.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c index 56ab749..94e7662 100644 --- a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c +++ b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c @@ -162,6 +162,9 @@ static int xen_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type) struct msi_desc *msidesc; int *v; + if (type == PCI_CAP_ID_MSI && nvec > 1) + return 1; + v = kzalloc(sizeof(int) * max(1, nvec), GFP_KERNEL); if (!v) return -ENOMEM; @@ -220,6 +223,9 @@ static int xen_hvm_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type) struct msi_desc *msidesc; struct msi_msg msg; + if (type == PCI_CAP_ID_MSI && nvec > 1) + return 1; + list_for_each_entry(msidesc, &dev->msi_list, list) { __read_msi_msg(msidesc, &msg); pirq = MSI_ADDR_EXT_DEST_ID(msg.address_hi) | @@ -263,6 +269,9 @@ static int xen_initdom_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type) int ret = 0; struct msi_desc *msidesc; + if (type == PCI_CAP_ID_MSI && nvec > 1) + return 1; + list_for_each_entry(msidesc, &dev->msi_list, list) { struct physdev_map_pirq map_irq; domid_t domid;