diff mbox

net: can: af_can.c: Fix checkpatch warnings

Message ID 1362918526-26730-1-git-send-email-valentin.ilie@gmail.com
State Changes Requested, archived
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show

Commit Message

Valentin Ilie March 10, 2013, 12:28 p.m. UTC
Replace printk(KERN_ERR with pr_err
Add space before {

Signed-off-by: Valentin Ilie <valentin.ilie@gmail.com>
---
 net/can/af_can.c | 15 +++++++--------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Comments

Oliver Hartkopp March 10, 2013, 12:45 p.m. UTC | #1
Hallo Valentin,

thanks for the idea for the cleanup.

But if you replace the the printk() statements it's worth to check if code
fits into a single line now, e.g.

On 10.03.2013 13:28, Valentin Ilie wrote:

 		r = NULL;
> @@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ int can_proto_register(const struct can_proto *cp)
>  	int err = 0;
>  
>  	if (proto < 0 || proto >= CAN_NPROTO) {
> -		printk(KERN_ERR "can: protocol number %d out of range\n",
> +		pr_err("can: protocol number %d out of range\n",
>  		       proto);


here " ,proto);" can obviously be move into the previous line while preserving
the 80 chars per line rule.


>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> @@ -761,7 +761,7 @@ int can_proto_register(const struct can_proto *cp)
>  	mutex_lock(&proto_tab_lock);
>  
>  	if (proto_tab[proto]) {
> -		printk(KERN_ERR "can: protocol %d already registered\n",
> +		pr_err("can: protocol %d already registered\n",
>  		       proto);


here too

>  		err = -EBUSY;
>  	} else
> @@ -817,8 +817,7 @@ static int can_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long msg,
>  		/* create new dev_rcv_lists for this device */
>  		d = kzalloc(sizeof(*d), GFP_KERNEL);
>  		if (!d) {
> -			printk(KERN_ERR
> -			       "can: allocation of receive list failed\n");
> +			pr_err("can: allocation of receive list failed\n");
>  			return NOTIFY_DONE;
>  		}


As i've seen in former patches from Joe Perches OOM messages are obsolete.

You could write

if(!d)
	return NOTIFY_DONE;

here instead.

Thanks,
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Daniel Mack March 10, 2013, 1:05 p.m. UTC | #2
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net> wrote:
> Hallo Valentin,
>
> thanks for the idea for the cleanup.
>
> But if you replace the the printk() statements it's worth to check if code
> fits into a single line now, e.g.
>
> On 10.03.2013 13:28, Valentin Ilie wrote:
>
>                 r = NULL;
>> @@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ int can_proto_register(const struct can_proto *cp)
>>       int err = 0;
>>
>>       if (proto < 0 || proto >= CAN_NPROTO) {
>> -             printk(KERN_ERR "can: protocol number %d out of range\n",
>> +             pr_err("can: protocol number %d out of range\n",
>>                      proto);
>
>
> here " ,proto);" can obviously be move into the previous line while preserving
> the 80 chars per line rule.
>
>
>>               return -EINVAL;
>>       }
>> @@ -761,7 +761,7 @@ int can_proto_register(const struct can_proto *cp)
>>       mutex_lock(&proto_tab_lock);
>>
>>       if (proto_tab[proto]) {
>> -             printk(KERN_ERR "can: protocol %d already registered\n",
>> +             pr_err("can: protocol %d already registered\n",
>>                      proto);
>
>
> here too
>
>>               err = -EBUSY;
>>       } else
>> @@ -817,8 +817,7 @@ static int can_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long msg,
>>               /* create new dev_rcv_lists for this device */
>>               d = kzalloc(sizeof(*d), GFP_KERNEL);
>>               if (!d) {
>> -                     printk(KERN_ERR
>> -                            "can: allocation of receive list failed\n");
>> +                     pr_err("can: allocation of receive list failed\n");
>>                       return NOTIFY_DONE;
>>               }
>
>
> As i've seen in former patches from Joe Perches OOM messages are obsolete.
>
> You could write
>
> if(!d)
>         return NOTIFY_DONE;
>
> here instead.

While at it, why not switch to dev_err() instead?


Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Oliver Hartkopp March 10, 2013, 1:11 p.m. UTC | #3
On 10.03.2013 14:05, Daniel Mack wrote:


>>> @@ -817,8 +817,7 @@ static int can_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long msg,
>>>               /* create new dev_rcv_lists for this device */
>>>               d = kzalloc(sizeof(*d), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>               if (!d) {
>>> -                     printk(KERN_ERR
>>> -                            "can: allocation of receive list failed\n");
>>> +                     pr_err("can: allocation of receive list failed\n");
>>>                       return NOTIFY_DONE;
>>>               }
>>
>>
>> As i've seen in former patches from Joe Perches OOM messages are obsolete.
>>
>> You could write
>>
>> if(!d)
>>         return NOTIFY_DONE;
>>
>> here instead.
> 
> While at it, why not switch to dev_err() instead?


Hm, no.

1. pr_err() would be fine, as dev_err() is for drivers - and we're in
linux/net here and not in linux/drivers

2. When removing the entire printk() statement there's nothing to be modified left

Regards,
Oliver

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/net/can/af_can.c b/net/can/af_can.c
index c48e522..a14c0aa 100644
--- a/net/can/af_can.c
+++ b/net/can/af_can.c
@@ -525,7 +525,7 @@  void can_rx_unregister(struct net_device *dev, canid_t can_id, canid_t mask,
 
 	d = find_dev_rcv_lists(dev);
 	if (!d) {
-		printk(KERN_ERR "BUG: receive list not found for "
+		pr_err("BUG: receive list not found for "
 		       "dev %s, id %03X, mask %03X\n",
 		       DNAME(dev), can_id, mask);
 		goto out;
@@ -552,7 +552,7 @@  void can_rx_unregister(struct net_device *dev, canid_t can_id, canid_t mask,
 	 */
 
 	if (!r) {
-		printk(KERN_ERR "BUG: receive list entry not found for "
+		pr_err("BUG: receive list entry not found for "
 		       "dev %s, id %03X, mask %03X\n",
 		       DNAME(dev), can_id, mask);
 		r = NULL;
@@ -749,7 +749,7 @@  int can_proto_register(const struct can_proto *cp)
 	int err = 0;
 
 	if (proto < 0 || proto >= CAN_NPROTO) {
-		printk(KERN_ERR "can: protocol number %d out of range\n",
+		pr_err("can: protocol number %d out of range\n",
 		       proto);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -761,7 +761,7 @@  int can_proto_register(const struct can_proto *cp)
 	mutex_lock(&proto_tab_lock);
 
 	if (proto_tab[proto]) {
-		printk(KERN_ERR "can: protocol %d already registered\n",
+		pr_err("can: protocol %d already registered\n",
 		       proto);
 		err = -EBUSY;
 	} else
@@ -817,8 +817,7 @@  static int can_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long msg,
 		/* create new dev_rcv_lists for this device */
 		d = kzalloc(sizeof(*d), GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!d) {
-			printk(KERN_ERR
-			       "can: allocation of receive list failed\n");
+			pr_err("can: allocation of receive list failed\n");
 			return NOTIFY_DONE;
 		}
 		BUG_ON(dev->ml_priv);
@@ -838,7 +837,7 @@  static int can_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long msg,
 				dev->ml_priv = NULL;
 			}
 		} else
-			printk(KERN_ERR "can: notifier: receive list not "
+			pr_err("can: notifier: receive list not "
 			       "found for dev %s\n", dev->name);
 
 		spin_unlock(&can_rcvlists_lock);
@@ -927,7 +926,7 @@  static __exit void can_exit(void)
 	/* remove created dev_rcv_lists from still registered CAN devices */
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	for_each_netdev_rcu(&init_net, dev) {
-		if (dev->type == ARPHRD_CAN && dev->ml_priv){
+		if (dev->type == ARPHRD_CAN && dev->ml_priv) {
 
 			struct dev_rcv_lists *d = dev->ml_priv;