From patchwork Mon Feb 11 15:55:01 2013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jack Howarth X-Patchwork-Id: 219630 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 59E452C02F5 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 02:55:19 +1100 (EST) Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1361202920; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received:Received: Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:User-Agent:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender: Delivered-To; bh=774QIUVvHD/1JdK170iZluYIjxw=; b=LXDjBW+JZb4mcW+ peZIaCdwec0L8BIieeXry6kViCIDJDExbFb0KNs3P40RPebl5MGFlhYdKNTol6uT MQNZYsoRoFCf+OVlqIBsPJnKJzl965CWsYQf+O0purBswNmNjgOWKSIrwush6w2U xao958frHhTzu83BiEaFIp7p5+O4= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:User-Agent:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; b=CsO/9Hl9/+jcW3mbwMsRV86F4xNhFMC6DDcs3MI7QrPURaJUacVetPfFgYfXrr ZNWCfyB+a6fPxUR8BFYPsfK7OsT3d20r7duS6XgngEGZAl4dF8fK2KHeya2+Vq3q AXLjRX7Djua6te6J3ynP1XVR3yrjXgbBvQVYe+jqREJaE=; Received: (qmail 30180 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2013 15:55:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 30114 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Feb 2013 15:55:09 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from bromo.med.uc.edu (HELO bromo.med.uc.edu) (129.137.3.146) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:55:03 +0000 Received: from bromo.med.uc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bromo.med.uc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F81B0011; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:55:02 -0500 (EST) Received: (from howarth@localhost) by bromo.med.uc.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id r1BFt1W3031354; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:55:01 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:55:01 -0500 From: Jack Howarth To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: jakub@redhat.com, dodji@redhat.com, kcc@google.com, dvyukov@google.com, mikestump@comcast.net, iain@codesourcery.com Subject: [PATCH] Disable libsanitizer before darwin10 Message-ID: <20130211155501.GA31314@bromo.med.uc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Iain Sandoe discovered that on intel darwin9, the asan testsuite suffers hundreds of failures due to the absence of dispatch calls (Grand Central Dispatch) prior to darwin10. The attached patch disables building libsanitizer on darwin8 and darwin9 until upstream decides to support the earlier darwin releases. Bootstrap and regression tested on x86_64-apple-darwin12. Okay for gcc trunk? Jack 2013-02-11 Jack Howarth * configure.tgt: Disable build on darwin9 and earlier. /libsanitizer Index: libsanitizer/configure.tgt =================================================================== --- libsanitizer/configure.tgt (revision 195940) +++ libsanitizer/configure.tgt (working copy) @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ case "${target}" in ;; sparc*-*-linux*) ;; - x86_64-*-darwin* | i?86-*-darwin*) + x86_64-*-darwin[1]* | i?86-*-darwin[1]*) TSAN_SUPPORTED=no ;; *)