| Submitter | Andreas Färber |
|---|---|
| Date | Feb. 2, 2013, 11:57 a.m. |
| Message ID | <1359806247-27799-2-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> |
| Download | mbox | patch |
| Permalink | /patch/217652/ |
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
Comments
Alex, Am 02.02.2013 12:57, schrieb Andreas Färber: > It was never implemented. > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> Too late for 1.4 now obviously. ;) Do you want to queue this on s390-next (i.e.,do you plan an early pull)? Or should I put it in qom-cpu-next? The remainder of the series is waiting on my VMState series, which seems unlikely to go into qom-cpu-next before the merge window. Andreas > --- > target-s390x/cpu.h | 1 - > 1 Datei geändert, 1 Zeile entfernt(-) > > diff --git a/target-s390x/cpu.h b/target-s390x/cpu.h > index 01e59b9..0070c40 100644 > --- a/target-s390x/cpu.h > +++ b/target-s390x/cpu.h > @@ -315,7 +315,6 @@ static inline int get_ilen(uint8_t opc) > S390CPU *cpu_s390x_init(const char *cpu_model); > void s390x_translate_init(void); > int cpu_s390x_exec(CPUS390XState *s); > -void cpu_s390x_close(CPUS390XState *s); > void do_interrupt (CPUS390XState *env); > > /* you can call this signal handler from your SIGBUS and SIGSEGV
On 15.02.2013, at 18:44, Andreas Färber wrote: > Alex, > > Am 02.02.2013 12:57, schrieb Andreas Färber: >> It was never implemented. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> > > Too late for 1.4 now obviously. ;) > > Do you want to queue this on s390-next (i.e.,do you plan an early pull)? > Or should I put it in qom-cpu-next? Just put it into qom-cpu-next :) Alex > > The remainder of the series is waiting on my VMState series, which seems > unlikely to go into qom-cpu-next before the merge window. > > Andreas > >> --- >> target-s390x/cpu.h | 1 - >> 1 Datei geändert, 1 Zeile entfernt(-) >> >> diff --git a/target-s390x/cpu.h b/target-s390x/cpu.h >> index 01e59b9..0070c40 100644 >> --- a/target-s390x/cpu.h >> +++ b/target-s390x/cpu.h >> @@ -315,7 +315,6 @@ static inline int get_ilen(uint8_t opc) >> S390CPU *cpu_s390x_init(const char *cpu_model); >> void s390x_translate_init(void); >> int cpu_s390x_exec(CPUS390XState *s); >> -void cpu_s390x_close(CPUS390XState *s); >> void do_interrupt (CPUS390XState *env); >> >> /* you can call this signal handler from your SIGBUS and SIGSEGV > > -- > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany > GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
Am 15.02.2013 18:47, schrieb Alexander Graf: > > On 15.02.2013, at 18:44, Andreas Färber wrote: > >> Alex, >> >> Am 02.02.2013 12:57, schrieb Andreas Färber: >>> It was never implemented. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> >> >> Too late for 1.4 now obviously. ;) >> >> Do you want to queue this on s390-next (i.e.,do you plan an early pull)? >> Or should I put it in qom-cpu-next? > > Just put it into qom-cpu-next :) Thanks, applied to qom-cpu: https://github.com/afaerber/qemu-cpu/commits/qom-cpu Andreas
Patch
diff --git a/target-s390x/cpu.h b/target-s390x/cpu.h index 01e59b9..0070c40 100644 --- a/target-s390x/cpu.h +++ b/target-s390x/cpu.h @@ -315,7 +315,6 @@ static inline int get_ilen(uint8_t opc) S390CPU *cpu_s390x_init(const char *cpu_model); void s390x_translate_init(void); int cpu_s390x_exec(CPUS390XState *s); -void cpu_s390x_close(CPUS390XState *s); void do_interrupt (CPUS390XState *env); /* you can call this signal handler from your SIGBUS and SIGSEGV
It was never implemented. Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> --- target-s390x/cpu.h | 1 - 1 Datei geändert, 1 Zeile entfernt(-)