From patchwork Fri Feb 1 16:13:31 2013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jiang Liu X-Patchwork-Id: 217517 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8FE12C0297 for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 03:13:55 +1100 (EST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754080Ab3BAQNw (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2013 11:13:52 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-f48.google.com ([209.85.160.48]:62417 "EHLO mail-pb0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751182Ab3BAQNv (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2013 11:13:51 -0500 Received: by mail-pb0-f48.google.com with SMTP id wy12so2209136pbc.35 for ; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:13:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1a9A8jCEHGmVuR9xlx+PQnNxc7bzyy7XMyYa3ivnAQc=; b=MN/N/NpuHSXNEqRoaQt59vWmFm5KboFMB4VcTFQl34V7Udmnxv1RTkWKgW4/0hB7K9 ASFH/DuvnuTN8OnPVYpa7sUOxQnDCoAHMjVaUYYyJFB7Y/QmyuEaafeVEg/VUn60VMzi 9ADYunb6IMeihFtcWHg2TYMU5BHrG/lAw2gwRpdsl/EOs4NMmAgFFLYxcbQoWrghfaD7 32doW+JeFFpq/BP7rNxBIAqrGr5hdeiSnmJyUqEX5dhm3s/27snTmhKgs980S5L/eeMM /zueLBX/dixXj8jzlWcs58MvxQWS21E2ZHWs6L0adxeT5mqhaQJi51CCxUEkuAGCsKrZ aUzQ== X-Received: by 10.66.85.167 with SMTP id i7mr31021605paz.57.1359735230188; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:13:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.104] ([114.246.172.10]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id nj1sm8845922pbc.13.2013.02.01.08.13.39 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:13:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <510BE9AB.9010702@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 00:13:31 +0800 From: Jiang Liu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jiang Liu CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Bjorn Helgaas , Yinghai Lu , Kenji Kaneshige , Yijing Wang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , ACPI Devel Maling List , Toshi Kani , Myron Stowe Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] introduce PCI bus notifier chain to get rid of the ACPI PCI subdriver interfaces References: <1358525267-14268-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com> <1598719.tGLtx5aHMZ@vostro.rjw.lan> <51072E1D.8020901@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <51072E1D.8020901@huawei.com> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org On 01/29/2013 10:04 AM, Jiang Liu wrote: > On 2013-1-29 8:34, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Monday, January 28, 2013 01:56:33 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Jiang Liu wrote: >>>> This is an RFC patchset to address review comments in thread at: >>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1946851/. The patch just pasts >>>> compilation. If no objection to the new implementation, I will >>>> go on to modify acpiphp driver and conduct tests. >>>> >>>> The main changes from V4 to V5 includes: >>>> 1) introduce a dedicated notifier chain for PCI buses >>>> 2) change pci_slot as built-in driver >>>> 3) unify the way to create/destroy PCI slots >>>> 4) introduce a kernel option to disable PCIe native hotplug >>>> >>>> TODO: >>>> 1) change acpiphp as built-in and unify the way to create/destroy ACPI >>>> based hotplug slots. >>>> 2) change other ACPI PCI subdriver in Yinghai's root bridge hotplug series >>>> to use the PCI bus notifier chain. >>>> 3) Remove the ACPI PCI subdriver interface eventaully. >>>> >>>> Jiang Liu (8): >>>> PCI: make PCI device create/destroy logic symmetric >>>> PCI: split registration of PCI bus devices into two stages >>>> PCI: add a blocking notifier chain for PCI bus addition/removal >>>> ACPI, PCI: avoid building pci_slot as module >>>> PCI, ACPI: hook PCI bus notifications to create/destroy PCI slots >>>> pci_slot: replace printk(KERN_xxx) with pr_xxx() >>>> PCI/PCIe: add "pci=nopciehp" to disable PCIe native hotplug >>>> PCI/PCIe: only claim PME from firmware when CONFIG_PCIE_PME is >>>> enabled >>>> >>>> Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 2 + >>>> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 5 +- >>>> drivers/acpi/internal.h | 5 + >>>> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 8 +- >>>> drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c | 217 ++++++++++------------------------- >>>> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 1 + >>>> drivers/pci/bus.c | 26 ++++- >>>> drivers/pci/pci.c | 2 + >>>> drivers/pci/pci.h | 1 + >>>> drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c | 7 +- >>>> drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c | 3 + >>>> drivers/pci/probe.c | 7 +- >>>> drivers/pci/remove.c | 15 +-- >>>> include/linux/pci.h | 21 ++++ >>>> 14 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 178 deletions(-) >>> >>> I think the problem we're trying to solve is that we don't initialize >>> hot-added devices, correctly, e.g., we don't set up AER, we don't >>> update acpi/pci_slot stuff, we probably don't set up PME etc. We also >>> have similar issues like IOMMU init on powerpc. >>> >>> Notifier chains seem like an unnecessarily complicated way to deal >>> with this. They're great for communicating between modules that stay >>> at arm's length from each other. But that's not the case here -- >>> everything is PCI and is quite closely coupled. I think AER, PME, >>> slot, etc., should be initialized directly in pci_device_add() or >>> somewhere nearby. >> >> I agree. >> >>> This might sound a bit radical because it implies some fairly >>> far-reaching changes. It means this code can't be a module (the only >>> one that can be built as a module today is pciehp, and I think >>> everybody agrees that we should make it static as soon as we can >>> figure out the acpiphp/pciehp issue). I think it also means the >>> pcieportdrv concept is of dubious value, since all the services should >>> be known at build-time and we probably don't need a registration >>> interface for them. >> >> It is of dubious value regardless. It just adds complexity for no gain. >> Moreover, these things are in fact not mutually independent. >> >> I've had a lot of headaches trying to work around that when I was working >> on PME support and later on _OSC for root bridges. Let's just take that >> stuff away once and for good. :-) > Hi Bjorn and Rafael, > Thanks for advice. We will go this direction to change those modules > as built-in. > Regards! > Gerry > Hi Bjorn, I have done some investigation about how to implement this without using notifier chain. Due to commit "PCI: Put pci_dev in device tree as early as possible", a PCI device will be registered to the driver core before creating the subordinate PCI bus. So we can't reply on the ACPI PCI device glue code to create/destroy PCI slots or acpiphp hotplug slots. So my current plan is to introduce two weak functions as below, is it acceptable? Regards! Gerry >> >> Thanks, >> Rafael >> >> > > --- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c index b494066..a5c22e7 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c @@ -673,6 +673,8 @@ add_dev: ret = device_register(&child->dev); WARN_ON(ret < 0); + pcibios_add_bus(child); + /* Create legacy_io and legacy_mem files for this bus */ pci_create_legacy_files(child); @@ -1661,6 +1663,14 @@ int __weak pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge * return 0; } +void __weak pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) +{ +} + +void __weak pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) +{ +} + struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus, struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata, struct list_head *resources) { @@ -1715,6 +1725,8 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int b if (error) goto class_dev_reg_err; + pcibios_remove_bus(b); + /* Create legacy_io and legacy_mem files for this bus */ pci_create_legacy_files(b); diff --git a/drivers/pci/remove.c b/drivers/pci/remove.c index fc38c48..3dbdf82 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/remove.c +++ b/drivers/pci/remove.c @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ void pci_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) return; pci_remove_legacy_files(bus); + pcibios_remove_bus(child); device_unregister(&bus->dev); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_remove_bus); diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h index 056d3d6..fd8ba0c 100644 --- a/include/linux/pci.h +++ b/include/linux/pci.h @@ -380,6 +380,8 @@ void pci_set_host_bridge_release(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge, void *release_data); int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge); +void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus); +void pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus); /* * The first PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCE_NUM PCI bus resources (those that correspond