From patchwork Wed Jan 16 15:56:35 2013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski X-Patchwork-Id: 212768 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from chlorine.canonical.com (chlorine.canonical.com [91.189.94.204]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4668D2C007E for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 03:10:31 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chlorine.canonical.com) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvVZE-00070J-Ia; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:10:20 +0000 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvVYv-0006pr-7b for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:10:01 +0000 Received: from [177.132.109.150] (helo=canonical.com) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvVYu-0007Jx-Am; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:10:01 +0000 From: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: [PATCH 195/222] cifs: adjust sequence number downward after signing NT_CANCEL request Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:56:35 -0200 Message-Id: <1358351822-7675-196-git-send-email-herton.krzesinski@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.9.5 In-Reply-To: <1358351822-7675-1-git-send-email-herton.krzesinski@canonical.com> References: <1358351822-7675-1-git-send-email-herton.krzesinski@canonical.com> X-Extended-Stable: 3.5 Cc: Steve French , Jeff Layton X-BeenThere: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Kernel team discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com Errors-To: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com 3.5.7.3 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Jeff Layton commit 31efee60f489c759c341454d755a9fd13de8c03d upstream. When a call goes out, the signing code adjusts the sequence number upward by two to account for the request and the response. An NT_CANCEL however doesn't get a response of its own, it just hurries the server along to get it to respond to the original request more quickly. Therefore, we must adjust the sequence number back down by one after signing a NT_CANCEL request. Reported-by: Tim Perry Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Steve French Signed-off-by: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski --- fs/cifs/smb1ops.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb1ops.c b/fs/cifs/smb1ops.c index 6dec38f..a288ec2a 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/smb1ops.c +++ b/fs/cifs/smb1ops.c @@ -51,6 +51,13 @@ send_nt_cancel(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, void *buf, mutex_unlock(&server->srv_mutex); return rc; } + + /* + * The response to this call was already factored into the sequence + * number when the call went out, so we must adjust it back downward + * after signing here. + */ + --server->sequence_number; rc = smb_send(server, in_buf, be32_to_cpu(in_buf->smb_buf_length)); mutex_unlock(&server->srv_mutex);