Patchwork [195/222] cifs: adjust sequence number downward after signing NT_CANCEL request

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
Date Jan. 16, 2013, 3:56 p.m.
Message ID <1358351822-7675-196-git-send-email-herton.krzesinski@canonical.com>
Download mbox | patch
Permalink /patch/212768/
State New
Headers show

Comments

Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski - Jan. 16, 2013, 3:56 p.m.
3.5.7.3 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>

commit 31efee60f489c759c341454d755a9fd13de8c03d upstream.

When a call goes out, the signing code adjusts the sequence number
upward by two to account for the request and the response. An NT_CANCEL
however doesn't get a response of its own, it just hurries the server
along to get it to respond to the original request more quickly.
Therefore, we must adjust the sequence number back down by one after
signing a NT_CANCEL request.

Reported-by: Tim Perry <tdparmor-sambabugs@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@canonical.com>
---
 fs/cifs/smb1ops.c |    7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

Patch

diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb1ops.c b/fs/cifs/smb1ops.c
index 6dec38f..a288ec2a 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/smb1ops.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/smb1ops.c
@@ -51,6 +51,13 @@  send_nt_cancel(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, void *buf,
 		mutex_unlock(&server->srv_mutex);
 		return rc;
 	}
+
+	/*
+	 * The response to this call was already factored into the sequence
+	 * number when the call went out, so we must adjust it back downward
+	 * after signing here.
+	 */
+	--server->sequence_number;
 	rc = smb_send(server, in_buf, be32_to_cpu(in_buf->smb_buf_length));
 	mutex_unlock(&server->srv_mutex);