Patchwork [GIT,PULL] MTU clksrc changes for v3.9

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Linus Walleij
Date Jan. 7, 2013, 10:05 a.m.
Message ID <CACRpkdaFLNWj4qg=571K5pCrE01r6JoSOGoUvGGBOCeEW=3hYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Download mbox
Permalink /patch/209888/
State New
Headers show

Pull-request

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-stericsson.git

Comments

Linus Walleij - Jan. 7, 2013, 10:05 a.m.
Hi Rafael,

Hi, this is a pull request for stuff for the *next* merge window, enabling
the MTU timer to be used for timer-based delay.

Since there are some pending patches moving the ux500 cpufreq driver
around here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=135515323413100&w=2
it should be applied to the cpufreq tree to minimize conflicts.
Patches are ACKed by John Stultz.

Please pull it into the cpufreq tree or advise on alternate path, we can
also take this and the other cpufreq patches through the ARM SoC
tree if you ACK them.

Yours,
Linus Walleij


The following changes since commit d1c3ed669a2d452cacfb48c2d171a1f364dae2ed:

  Linux 3.8-rc2 (2013-01-02 18:13:21 -0800)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-stericsson.git
tags/clksrc-mtu-for-arm-soc

for you to fetch changes up to f644f2260aba851219e751a68ed2d37d6306fa0a:

  cpufreq: db8500: set CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS (2013-01-06 23:55:51 +0100)

----------------------------------------------------------------
- Implement timer-based delay on the Nomadik MTU
  clocksource
- Modify CPUFREQ to account for the same change.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Fabio Baltieri (2):
      clocksource: nomadik-mtu: support timer-based delay
      cpufreq: db8500: set CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS

 drivers/clocksource/nomadik-mtu.c | 11 +++++++++++
 drivers/cpufreq/db8500-cpufreq.c  |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Linus Walleij - Jan. 7, 2013, 10:13 a.m.
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:

> Since there are some pending patches moving the ux500 cpufreq driver
> around here:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=135515323413100&w=2
> it should be applied to the cpufreq tree to minimize conflicts.
> Patches are ACKed by John Stultz.
>
> Please pull it into the cpufreq tree or advise on alternate path, we can
> also take this and the other cpufreq patches through the ARM SoC
> tree if you ACK them.

Thinking of it again I also sent out this patch messing around with the
cpufreq driver:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=135754842927541&w=2

I think it may be best after all to take all of this through the ARM
SoC tree.

But I'd like your ACKs on the CPUfreq stuff though... The patch
here
"cpufreq: db8500: set CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS",
These five patches:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=135515323413100&w=2
And the one just referenced:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=135754842927541&w=2

Could you please help out?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
Rafael J. Wysocki - Jan. 7, 2013, 1:47 p.m.
On Monday, January 07, 2013 11:13:53 AM Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> > Since there are some pending patches moving the ux500 cpufreq driver
> > around here:
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=135515323413100&w=2
> > it should be applied to the cpufreq tree to minimize conflicts.
> > Patches are ACKed by John Stultz.
> >
> > Please pull it into the cpufreq tree or advise on alternate path, we can
> > also take this and the other cpufreq patches through the ARM SoC
> > tree if you ACK them.
> 
> Thinking of it again I also sent out this patch messing around with the
> cpufreq driver:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=135754842927541&w=2
> 
> I think it may be best after all to take all of this through the ARM
> SoC tree.
> 
> But I'd like your ACKs on the CPUfreq stuff though... The patch
> here
> "cpufreq: db8500: set CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS",
> These five patches:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=135515323413100&w=2
> And the one just referenced:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=135754842927541&w=2
> 
> Could you please help out?

Please regard these things as ACKed.

Thanks,
Rafael
Linus Walleij - Jan. 7, 2013, 2:37 p.m.
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:

> Please regard these things as ACKed.

Thanks a lot Rafael!

Yours,
Linus Walleij