libnl: bump to version 3.2.17

Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
---
 package/libnl/libnl.mk |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

>>>>> "Gustavo" == Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> writes:

 Gustavo> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
 Gustavo> ---
 Gustavo>  package/libnl/libnl.mk |    2 +-
 Gustavo>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

 Gustavo> diff --git a/package/libnl/libnl.mk b/package/libnl/libnl.mk
 Gustavo> index 9bf680e..12494f4 100644
 Gustavo> --- a/package/libnl/libnl.mk
 Gustavo> +++ b/package/libnl/libnl.mk
 Gustavo> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 Gustavo>  #
 Gustavo>  #############################################################
 
 Gustavo> -LIBNL_VERSION = 3.2.16
 Gustavo> +LIBNL_VERSION = 3.2.17

Committed, thanks.

Could you have a look at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/208318/ ?

On 01/04/2013 05:46 PM, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>  Gustavo> -LIBNL_VERSION = 3.2.16
>  Gustavo> +LIBNL_VERSION = 3.2.17
> 
> Committed, thanks.
> 
> Could you have a look at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/208318/ ?

Yes, it's no longer required, part of 3.2.17
Seems many people had issues with old enough headers and upstream
decided to release .17 with those patches to fit it.
Also fixes our previous autobuild errors which i assume went away when
Thomas probably upgraded to new toolchain versions.
We are talking about <2.6.32 headers IIRC.
Regards.

>>>>> "Gustavo" == Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> writes:

 >> Could you have a look at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/208318/ ?

 Gustavo> Yes, it's no longer required, part of 3.2.17
 Gustavo> Seems many people had issues with old enough headers and upstream
 Gustavo> decided to release .17 with those patches to fit it.
 Gustavo> Also fixes our previous autobuild errors which i assume went away when
 Gustavo> Thomas probably upgraded to new toolchain versions.
 Gustavo> We are talking about <2.6.32 headers IIRC.

Ok, thanks - I'll mark that patch as superseeded then.

Dear Gustavo Zacarias,

On Fri,  4 Jan 2013 17:42:15 -0300, Gustavo Zacarias wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
> ---
>  package/libnl/libnl.mk |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

libnl is causing a recurrent build failure:

  CC     netfilter/exp_obj.lo
netfilter/exp_obj.c: In function 'exp_dump_details':
netfilter/exp_obj.c:271:23: error: 'NF_CT_EXPECT_PERMANENT' undeclared (first use in this function)
netfilter/exp_obj.c:271:23: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
netfilter/exp_obj.c:273:23: error: 'NF_CT_EXPECT_INACTIVE' undeclared (first use in this function)
netfilter/exp_obj.c:275:23: error: 'NF_CT_EXPECT_USERSPACE' undeclared (first use in this function)

See:

  http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/28f23910e2c2090e6f37e8d6a26cdb5adf9615c2/
  http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/b8d0b9e7d5ea3a8f3c4ba29faeee0434ea5a1111/

Could you have a look?

Thanks a lot!

Thomas

On 01/08/2013 02:15 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:

> libnl is causing a recurrent build failure:
> 
>   CC     netfilter/exp_obj.lo
> netfilter/exp_obj.c: In function 'exp_dump_details':
> netfilter/exp_obj.c:271:23: error: 'NF_CT_EXPECT_PERMANENT' undeclared (first use in this function)
> netfilter/exp_obj.c:271:23: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> netfilter/exp_obj.c:273:23: error: 'NF_CT_EXPECT_INACTIVE' undeclared (first use in this function)
> netfilter/exp_obj.c:275:23: error: 'NF_CT_EXPECT_USERSPACE' undeclared (first use in this function)
> 
> See:
> 
>   http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/28f23910e2c2090e6f37e8d6a26cdb5adf9615c2/
>   http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/b8d0b9e7d5ea3a8f3c4ba29faeee0434ea5a1111/
> 
> Could you have a look?

Bump to version 3.2.18 fixes it, fresh release from 4 hours ago.
Let's just hope they're done with this :)
Regards.