Comments
Patch
@@ -1303,7 +1303,7 @@ static void cpu_x86_set_props(X86CPU *cpu, QDict *features, Error **errp)
/* Parse "+feature,-feature,feature=foo" CPU feature string
*/
-static int cpu_x86_parse_featurestr(x86_def_t *x86_cpu_def, char *features,
+static int cpu_x86_parse_featurestr(X86CPU *cpu, char *features,
QDict **props)
{
char *featurestr; /* Single 'key=value" string being parsed */
@@ -1374,7 +1374,7 @@ static int cpu_x86_parse_featurestr(x86_def_t *x86_cpu_def, char *features,
fprintf(stderr, "bad numerical value %s\n", val);
goto error;
}
- x86_cpu_def->tsc_khz = tsc_freq / 1000;
+ cpu->env.tsc_khz = tsc_freq / 1000;
} else if (!strcmp(featurestr, "hv_spinlocks")) {
char *err;
numvalue = strtoul(val, &err, 0);
@@ -1400,20 +1400,20 @@ static int cpu_x86_parse_featurestr(x86_def_t *x86_cpu_def, char *features,
goto error;
}
}
- x86_cpu_def->features |= plus_features;
- x86_cpu_def->ext_features |= plus_ext_features;
- x86_cpu_def->ext2_features |= plus_ext2_features;
- x86_cpu_def->ext3_features |= plus_ext3_features;
- x86_cpu_def->kvm_features |= plus_kvm_features;
- x86_cpu_def->svm_features |= plus_svm_features;
- x86_cpu_def->cpuid_7_0_ebx_features |= plus_7_0_ebx_features;
- x86_cpu_def->features &= ~minus_features;
- x86_cpu_def->ext_features &= ~minus_ext_features;
- x86_cpu_def->ext2_features &= ~minus_ext2_features;
- x86_cpu_def->ext3_features &= ~minus_ext3_features;
- x86_cpu_def->kvm_features &= ~minus_kvm_features;
- x86_cpu_def->svm_features &= ~minus_svm_features;
- x86_cpu_def->cpuid_7_0_ebx_features &= ~minus_7_0_ebx_features;
+ cpu->env.cpuid_features |= plus_features;
+ cpu->env.cpuid_ext_features |= plus_ext_features;
+ cpu->env.cpuid_ext2_features |= plus_ext2_features;
+ cpu->env.cpuid_ext3_features |= plus_ext3_features;
+ cpu->env.cpuid_kvm_features |= plus_kvm_features;
+ cpu->env.cpuid_svm_features |= plus_svm_features;
+ cpu->env.cpuid_7_0_ebx_features |= plus_7_0_ebx_features;
+ cpu->env.cpuid_features &= ~minus_features;
+ cpu->env.cpuid_ext_features &= ~minus_ext_features;
+ cpu->env.cpuid_ext2_features &= ~minus_ext2_features;
+ cpu->env.cpuid_ext3_features &= ~minus_ext3_features;
+ cpu->env.cpuid_kvm_features &= ~minus_kvm_features;
+ cpu->env.cpuid_svm_features &= ~minus_svm_features;
+ cpu->env.cpuid_7_0_ebx_features &= ~minus_7_0_ebx_features;
g_strfreev(feat_array);
return 0;
@@ -1561,12 +1561,13 @@ X86CPU *cpu_x86_create(const char *cpu_model, Error **errp)
&def->ext3_features, &def->kvm_features,
&def->svm_features, &def->cpuid_7_0_ebx_features);
- if (cpu_x86_parse_featurestr(def, features, &props) < 0) {
+ cpudef_2_x86_cpu(cpu, def, &error);
+
+ if (cpu_x86_parse_featurestr(cpu, features, &props) < 0) {
error_setg(&error, "Invalid cpu_model string format: %s", cpu_model);
goto out;
}
- cpudef_2_x86_cpu(cpu, def, &error);
cpu_x86_set_props(cpu, props, &error);
out:
Note that this is temporary: just like we would eventually kill usage of x86_def_t inside cpu_x86_parse_featurestr(), we will eventually kill usage of X86CPU inside that function as well. This will help us keep the x86_def_t usage restricted to the CPU object creation code. Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> --- target-i386/cpu.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)