| Message ID | 1357268368-3692-1-git-send-email-dillona@dillona.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On 01/03/2013 06:59 PM, dillona@dillona.com wrote: > From: Dillon Amburgey <dillona@dillona.com> > > This is used at least on the Alpha architecture > > Signed-off-by: Dillon Amburgey <dillona@dillona.com> > --- > linux-user/syscall.c | 8 ++++++++ > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c > index e99adab..0cd54f3 100644 > --- a/linux-user/syscall.c > +++ b/linux-user/syscall.c > @@ -5497,6 +5497,14 @@ abi_long do_syscall(void *cpu_env, int num, abi_long arg1, > unlock_user(p3, arg3, 0); > break; > } > +#ifdef TARGET_NR_oldumount > + case TARGET_NR_oldumount: > + if (!(p = lock_user_string(arg1))) > + goto efault; > + ret = get_errno(umount(p)); > + unlock_user(p, arg1, 0); > + break; > +#endif It's probably better to rename the Alpha TARGET_NR_{oldumount,umount} syscall names to TARGET_NR_{umount,umount2}. Regardless of what the names the kernel uses for these, it's the mapping to the implementations in the syscall tables that matters. r~
diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c index e99adab..0cd54f3 100644 --- a/linux-user/syscall.c +++ b/linux-user/syscall.c @@ -5497,6 +5497,14 @@ abi_long do_syscall(void *cpu_env, int num, abi_long arg1, unlock_user(p3, arg3, 0); break; } +#ifdef TARGET_NR_oldumount + case TARGET_NR_oldumount: + if (!(p = lock_user_string(arg1))) + goto efault; + ret = get_errno(umount(p)); + unlock_user(p, arg1, 0); + break; +#endif #ifdef TARGET_NR_umount case TARGET_NR_umount: if (!(p = lock_user_string(arg1)))