diff mbox

[4/4,v3] net/smsc911x: Provide common clock functionality

Message ID 20130103111450.GC14714@gmail.com
State Not Applicable, archived
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show

Commit Message

Lee Jones Jan. 3, 2013, 11:14 a.m. UTC
Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the
SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk
framework to do just that. If no clock is provided, it will just
be ignored and the driver will continue to assume that no clock
is required for the chip to run successfully.

Cc: Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@shawell.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c |   29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Linus Walleij Jan. 3, 2013, 2:28 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:

> Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the
> SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk
> framework to do just that. If no clock is provided, it will just
> be ignored and the driver will continue to assume that no clock
> is required for the chip to run successfully.
>
> Cc: Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@shawell.net>
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>

Looks all right to me now:
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Lee Jones Jan. 7, 2013, 2:16 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> > Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the
> > SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk
> > framework to do just that. If no clock is provided, it will just
> > be ignored and the driver will continue to assume that no clock
> > is required for the chip to run successfully.
> >
> > Cc: Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@shawell.net>
> > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> 
> Looks all right to me now:
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Great, thanks Linus.

Who will take this patch now?
Lee Jones Jan. 9, 2013, 8:55 a.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> > Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the
> > SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk
> > framework to do just that. If no clock is provided, it will just
> > be ignored and the driver will continue to assume that no clock
> > is required for the chip to run successfully.
> >
> > Cc: Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@shawell.net>
> > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> 
> Looks all right to me now:
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

I still need a maintiner Ack for this before I can push it.

Anyone?
Ulf Hansson Jan. 9, 2013, 4:32 p.m. UTC | #4
On 9 January 2013 09:55, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Jan 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the
>> > SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk
>> > framework to do just that. If no clock is provided, it will just
>> > be ignored and the driver will continue to assume that no clock
>> > is required for the chip to run successfully.
>> >
>> > Cc: Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@shawell.net>
>> > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
>> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>>
>> Looks all right to me now:
>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>
> I still need a maintiner Ack for this before I can push it.
>
> Anyone?
>
> --
> Lee Jones
> Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
> Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Linus Walleij Jan. 17, 2013, 10:25 a.m. UTC | #5
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Jan 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the
>> > SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk
>> > framework to do just that. If no clock is provided, it will just
>> > be ignored and the driver will continue to assume that no clock
>> > is required for the chip to run successfully.
>> >
>> > Cc: Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@shawell.net>
>> > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
>> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>>
>> Looks all right to me now:
>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>
> I still need a maintiner Ack for this before I can push it.
>
> Anyone?

Steve is there sometimes. But I'd ask David Miller to ACK
it if he's OK with the change.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Lee Jones Jan. 17, 2013, 10:47 a.m. UTC | #6
> >> > Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the
> >> > SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk
> >> > framework to do just that. If no clock is provided, it will just
> >> > be ignored and the driver will continue to assume that no clock
> >> > is required for the chip to run successfully.
> >> >
> >> > Cc: Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@shawell.net>
> >> > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> >> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> >>
> >> Looks all right to me now:
> >> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> >
> > I still need a maintiner Ack for this before I can push it.
> >
> > Anyone?
> 
> Steve is there sometimes. But I'd ask David Miller to ACK
> it if he's OK with the change.
> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

Hi David,

Does this [1] patch look okay to you too?

It's the last Ack I require before I can push the set.

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1926971/
David Miller Jan. 17, 2013, 7:36 p.m. UTC | #7
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:47:44 +0000

> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1926971/

I'm fine with this:

Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c
index e112877..f9b6bb7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ 
 #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
 
 #include <linux/crc32.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 #include <linux/etherdevice.h>
@@ -144,6 +145,9 @@  struct smsc911x_data {
 
 	/* regulators */
 	struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[SMSC911X_NUM_SUPPLIES];
+
+	/* clock */
+	struct clk *clk;
 };
 
 /* Easy access to information */
@@ -369,7 +373,7 @@  out:
 }
 
 /*
- * enable resources, currently just regulators.
+ * enable regulator and clock resources.
  */
 static int smsc911x_enable_resources(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
@@ -382,6 +386,13 @@  static int smsc911x_enable_resources(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (ret)
 		netdev_err(ndev, "failed to enable regulators %d\n",
 				ret);
+
+	if (!IS_ERR(pdata->clk)) {
+		ret = clk_prepare_enable(pdata->clk);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			netdev_err(ndev, "failed to enable clock %d\n", ret);
+	}
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -396,6 +407,10 @@  static int smsc911x_disable_resources(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	ret = regulator_bulk_disable(ARRAY_SIZE(pdata->supplies),
 			pdata->supplies);
+
+	if (!IS_ERR(pdata->clk))
+		clk_disable_unprepare(pdata->clk);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -421,6 +436,12 @@  static int smsc911x_request_resources(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (ret)
 		netdev_err(ndev, "couldn't get regulators %d\n",
 				ret);
+
+	/* Request clock */
+	pdata->clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
+	if (IS_ERR(pdata->clk))
+		netdev_warn(ndev, "couldn't get clock %li\n", PTR_ERR(pdata->clk));
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -436,6 +457,12 @@  static void smsc911x_free_resources(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	/* Free regulators */
 	regulator_bulk_free(ARRAY_SIZE(pdata->supplies),
 			pdata->supplies);
+
+	/* Free clock */
+	if (!IS_ERR(pdata->clk)) {
+		clk_put(pdata->clk);
+		pdata->clk = NULL;
+	}
 }
 
 /* waits for MAC not busy, with timeout.  Only called by smsc911x_mac_read