Message ID | 1355517897.19932.136.camel@pasglop (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show |
On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 07:44 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > Finally managed to get my head away from some other distractions > to put this pull request together, sorry for the lateness :-) > > The main highlight is probably some base POWER8 support. There's > more to come such as transactional memory support but that will > wait for the next one. To clear up some misunderstanding, here I meant next merge window. > Overall it's pretty quiet, or rather I've been pretty poor at > picking things up from patchwork and reviewing them this time > around and Kumar no better on the FSL side it seems... Cheers, Ben.
Hi Ben, On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 07:44:57 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: ... > Overall it's pretty quiet, or rather I've been pretty poor at > picking things up from patchwork and reviewing them this time > around and Kumar no better on the FSL side it seems... Could you please also include some 5xxx patches for v3.8 in your pull request? I've submitted a pull request for them last week http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/205138 Thanks, Anatolij
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 09:30 +0100, Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > > Overall it's pretty quiet, or rather I've been pretty poor at > > picking things up from patchwork and reviewing them this time > > around and Kumar no better on the FSL side it seems... > > Could you please also include some 5xxx patches for v3.8 in your pull > request? I've submitted a pull request for them last week > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/205138 Last week is a bit late :-) However, I think your tree was in -next before that wasn't it ? In which case it's ok, I can include it tomorrow and ask Linus to pick it up. Cheers, Ben
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 21:06:25 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: ... > Last week is a bit late :-) However, I think your tree was in -next > before that wasn't it ? In which case it's ok, I can include it tomorrow > and ask Linus to pick it up. yes, 5xxx tree was in -next before that. Thanks, Anatolij