From patchwork Thu Dec 13 13:59:39 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski X-Patchwork-Id: 206060 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from chlorine.canonical.com (chlorine.canonical.com [91.189.94.204]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0472C0097 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 01:16:49 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chlorine.canonical.com) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tj9aa-0000G5-4l; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:16:40 +0000 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tj9Y0-0006yT-KA for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:14:00 +0000 Received: from 200.139.123.215.dynamic.adsl.gvt.net.br ([200.139.123.215] helo=canonical.com) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tj9Xz-0004pf-Sw; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:14:00 +0000 From: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: [PATCH 214/241] net: correct check in dev_addr_del() Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:59:39 -0200 Message-Id: <1355407206-17100-215-git-send-email-herton.krzesinski@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.9.5 In-Reply-To: <1355407206-17100-1-git-send-email-herton.krzesinski@canonical.com> References: <1355407206-17100-1-git-send-email-herton.krzesinski@canonical.com> Cc: Jiri Pirko , "David S. Miller" X-BeenThere: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Kernel team discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com Errors-To: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com 3.5.7.2 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Jiri Pirko commit a652208e0b52c190e57f2a075ffb5e897fe31c3b upstream. Check (ha->addr == dev->dev_addr) is always true because dev_addr_init() sets this. Correct the check to behave properly on addr removal. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski --- net/core/dev_addr_lists.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c b/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c index c4cc2bc..716f363 100644 --- a/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c +++ b/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c @@ -317,7 +317,8 @@ int dev_addr_del(struct net_device *dev, unsigned char *addr, */ ha = list_first_entry(&dev->dev_addrs.list, struct netdev_hw_addr, list); - if (ha->addr == dev->dev_addr && ha->refcount == 1) + if (!memcmp(ha->addr, addr, dev->addr_len) && + ha->type == addr_type && ha->refcount == 1) return -ENOENT; err = __hw_addr_del(&dev->dev_addrs, addr, dev->addr_len,