From patchwork Thu Dec 13 13:58:46 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski X-Patchwork-Id: 206008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from chlorine.canonical.com (chlorine.canonical.com [91.189.94.204]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361BB2C0097 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 01:13:02 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chlorine.canonical.com) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tj9Wx-0006Dn-GH; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:12:55 +0000 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tj9Up-00053K-NO for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:10:44 +0000 Received: from 200.139.123.215.dynamic.adsl.gvt.net.br ([200.139.123.215] helo=canonical.com) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tj9Un-0004fj-JY; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:10:42 +0000 From: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: [PATCH 161/241] ACPI video: Ignore errors after _DOD evaluation. Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:58:46 -0200 Message-Id: <1355407206-17100-162-git-send-email-herton.krzesinski@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.9.5 In-Reply-To: <1355407206-17100-1-git-send-email-herton.krzesinski@canonical.com> References: <1355407206-17100-1-git-send-email-herton.krzesinski@canonical.com> Cc: Igor Murzov , Zhang Rui X-BeenThere: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Kernel team discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com Errors-To: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com 3.5.7.2 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Igor Murzov commit fba4e087361605d1eed63343bb08811f097c83ee upstream. There are systems where video module known to work fine regardless of broken _DOD and ignoring returned value here doesn't cause any issues later. This should fix brightness controls on some laptops. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47861 Signed-off-by: Igor Murzov Reviewed-by: Sergey V Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui Signed-off-by: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski --- drivers/acpi/video.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video.c b/drivers/acpi/video.c index 1e0a9e1..9fe2659 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/video.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/video.c @@ -1345,12 +1345,15 @@ static int acpi_video_bus_get_devices(struct acpi_video_bus *video, struct acpi_device *device) { - int status; + int status = 0; struct acpi_device *dev; - status = acpi_video_device_enumerate(video); - if (status) - return status; + /* + * There are systems where video module known to work fine regardless + * of broken _DOD and ignoring returned value here doesn't cause + * any issues later. + */ + acpi_video_device_enumerate(video); list_for_each_entry(dev, &device->children, node) {