From patchwork Thu Dec 13 13:56:33 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski X-Patchwork-Id: 205878 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from chlorine.canonical.com (chlorine.canonical.com [91.189.94.204]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025942C009B for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 01:03:19 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chlorine.canonical.com) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tj9NT-0000rL-8m; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:03:07 +0000 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tj9Mn-0000OZ-KS for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:02:25 +0000 Received: from 200.139.123.215.dynamic.adsl.gvt.net.br ([200.139.123.215] helo=canonical.com) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tj9Mm-000486-Ur; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:02:25 +0000 From: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: [PATCH 028/241] rt2800: validate step value for temperature compensation Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:56:33 -0200 Message-Id: <1355407206-17100-29-git-send-email-herton.krzesinski@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.9.5 In-Reply-To: <1355407206-17100-1-git-send-email-herton.krzesinski@canonical.com> References: <1355407206-17100-1-git-send-email-herton.krzesinski@canonical.com> Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka X-BeenThere: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Kernel team discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com Errors-To: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com 3.5.7.2 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Stanislaw Gruszka commit bf7e1abe434ba9e22e8dc04a4cba4ab504b788b8 upstream. Some hardware has correct (!= 0xff) value of tssi_bounds[4] in the EEPROM, but step is equal to 0xff. This results on ridiculous delta calculations and completely broke TX power settings. Reported-and-tested-by: Pavel Lucik Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn Signed-off-by: John W. Linville Signed-off-by: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski --- drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c index dfc90d3..a15bf1c 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c @@ -2255,7 +2255,7 @@ static int rt2800_get_gain_calibration_delta(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev) /* * Check if temperature compensation is supported. */ - if (tssi_bounds[4] == 0xff) + if (tssi_bounds[4] == 0xff || step == 0xff) return 0; /*