[3.5.y.z,extended,stable] Patch "x86, fpu: Avoid FPU lazy restore after suspend" has been added to staging queue

Message ID 1355158867-16432-1-git-send-email-herton.krzesinski@canonical.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski Dec. 10, 2012, 5:01 p.m.
This is a note to let you know that I have just added a patch titled

    x86, fpu: Avoid FPU lazy restore after suspend

to the linux-3.5.y-queue branch of the 3.5.y.z extended stable tree 
which can be found at:


If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to this tree, please 
reply to this email.

For more information about the 3.5.y.z tree, see



From 124606b1fa23adc5a479f2ca02265af8f969820a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:15:32 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] x86, fpu: Avoid FPU lazy restore after suspend

commit 644c154186386bb1fa6446bc5e037b9ed098db46 upstream.

When a cpu enters S3 state, the FPU state is lost.
After resuming for S3, if we try to lazy restore the FPU for a process running
on the same CPU, this will result in a corrupted FPU context.

Ensure that "fpu_owner_task" is properly invalided when (re-)initializing a CPU,
so nobody will try to lazy restore a state which doesn't exist in the hardware.

Tested with a 64-bit kernel on a 4-core Ivybridge CPU with eagerfpu=off,
by doing thousands of suspend/resume cycles with 4 processes doing FPU
operations running. Without the patch, a process is killed after a
few hundreds cycles by a SIGFPE.

Cc: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olofj@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1354306532-1014-1-git-send-email-vpalatin@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@canonical.com>
 arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h |   15 +++++++++------
 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c           |    5 +++++
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)



diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h
index 75f4c6d..04cb0f8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h
@@ -334,14 +334,17 @@  static inline void __thread_fpu_begin(struct task_struct *tsk)
 typedef struct { int preload; } fpu_switch_t;

- * FIXME! We could do a totally lazy restore, but we need to
- * add a per-cpu "this was the task that last touched the FPU
- * on this CPU" variable, and the task needs to have a "I last
- * touched the FPU on this CPU" and check them.
+ * Must be run with preemption disabled: this clears the fpu_owner_task,
+ * on this CPU.
- * We don't do that yet, so "fpu_lazy_restore()" always returns
- * false, but some day..
+ * This will disable any lazy FPU state restore of the current FPU state,
+ * but if the current thread owns the FPU, it will still be saved by.
+static inline void __cpu_disable_lazy_restore(unsigned int cpu)
+	per_cpu(fpu_owner_task, cpu) = NULL;
 static inline int fpu_lazy_restore(struct task_struct *new, unsigned int cpu)
 	return new == this_cpu_read_stable(fpu_owner_task) &&
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index 7bd8a08..6977453 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -66,6 +66,8 @@ 
 #include <asm/mwait.h>
 #include <asm/apic.h>
 #include <asm/io_apic.h>
+#include <asm/i387.h>
+#include <asm/fpu-internal.h>
 #include <asm/setup.h>
 #include <asm/uv/uv.h>
 #include <linux/mc146818rtc.h>
@@ -826,6 +828,9 @@  int __cpuinit native_cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *tidle)

 	per_cpu(cpu_state, cpu) = CPU_UP_PREPARE;

+	/* the FPU context is blank, nobody can own it */
+	__cpu_disable_lazy_restore(cpu);
 	err = do_boot_cpu(apicid, cpu, tidle);
 	if (err) {
 		pr_debug("do_boot_cpu failed %d\n", err);