@@ -882,6 +882,45 @@ static void intel_sdvo_dump_hdmi_buf(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo)
}
#endif
+static bool intel_sdvo_write_infoframe(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo,
+ unsigned if_index, uint8_t tx_rate,
+ uint8_t *data, unsigned length)
+{
+ uint8_t set_buf_index[2] = { if_index, 0 };
+ uint8_t hbuf_size, tmp[8];
+ int i;
+
+ if (!intel_sdvo_set_value(intel_sdvo,
+ SDVO_CMD_SET_HBUF_INDEX,
+ set_buf_index, 2))
+ return false;
+
+ if (!intel_sdvo_get_value(intel_sdvo, SDVO_CMD_GET_HBUF_INFO,
+ &hbuf_size, 1))
+ return false;
+
+ /* Buffer size is 0 based, hooray! */
+ hbuf_size++;
+
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("writing sdvo hbuf: %i, hbuf_size %i, hbuf_size: %i\n",
+ if_index, length, hbuf_size);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < hbuf_size; i += 8) {
+ memset(tmp, 0, 8);
+ if (i < length)
+ memcpy(tmp, data + i, min_t(unsigned, 8, length - i));
+
+ if (!intel_sdvo_set_value(intel_sdvo,
+ SDVO_CMD_SET_HBUF_DATA,
+ tmp, 8))
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return intel_sdvo_set_value(intel_sdvo,
+ SDVO_CMD_SET_HBUF_TXRATE,
+ &tx_rate, 1);
+}
+
static bool intel_sdvo_set_avi_infoframe(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo)
{
struct dip_infoframe avi_if = {
@@ -889,11 +928,7 @@ static bool intel_sdvo_set_avi_infoframe(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo)
.ver = DIP_VERSION_AVI,
.len = DIP_LEN_AVI,
};
- uint8_t tx_rate = SDVO_HBUF_TX_VSYNC;
- uint8_t set_buf_index[2] = { 1, 0 };
uint8_t sdvo_data[4 + sizeof(avi_if.body.avi)];
- uint64_t *data = (uint64_t *)sdvo_data;
- unsigned i;
intel_dip_infoframe_csum(&avi_if);
@@ -903,22 +938,9 @@ static bool intel_sdvo_set_avi_infoframe(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo)
sdvo_data[3] = avi_if.checksum;
memcpy(&sdvo_data[4], &avi_if.body, sizeof(avi_if.body.avi));
- if (!intel_sdvo_set_value(intel_sdvo,
- SDVO_CMD_SET_HBUF_INDEX,
- set_buf_index, 2))
- return false;
-
- for (i = 0; i < sizeof(sdvo_data); i += 8) {
- if (!intel_sdvo_set_value(intel_sdvo,
- SDVO_CMD_SET_HBUF_DATA,
- data, 8))
- return false;
- data++;
- }
-
- return intel_sdvo_set_value(intel_sdvo,
- SDVO_CMD_SET_HBUF_TXRATE,
- &tx_rate, 1);
+ return intel_sdvo_write_infoframe(intel_sdvo, SDVO_HBUF_INDEX_AVI_IF,
+ SDVO_HBUF_TX_VSYNC,
+ sdvo_data, sizeof(sdvo_data));
}
static bool intel_sdvo_set_tv_format(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo)
@@ -708,6 +708,8 @@ struct intel_sdvo_enhancements_arg {
#define SDVO_CMD_SET_AUDIO_STAT 0x91
#define SDVO_CMD_GET_AUDIO_STAT 0x92
#define SDVO_CMD_SET_HBUF_INDEX 0x93
+ #define SDVO_HBUF_INDEX_ELD 0
+ #define SDVO_HBUF_INDEX_AVI_IF 1
#define SDVO_CMD_GET_HBUF_INDEX 0x94
#define SDVO_CMD_GET_HBUF_INFO 0x95
#define SDVO_CMD_SET_HBUF_AV_SPLIT 0x96
This is a note to let you know that I have just added a patch titled drm/i915: clear the entire sdvo infoframe buffer to the linux-3.5.y-queue branch of the 3.5.y.z extended stable tree which can be found at: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/linux-3.5.y-queue If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to this tree, please reply to this email. For more information about the 3.5.y.z tree, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ExtendedStable Thanks. -Herton ------ From 1c927b989e9e25893da01374673152ebbd81fa47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 12:52:39 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: clear the entire sdvo infoframe buffer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Extended-Stable: 3.5 commit b6e0e543f75729f207b9c72b0162ae61170635b2 upstream. Like in the case of native hdmi, which is fixed already in commit adf00b26d18e1b3570451296e03bcb20e4798cdd Author: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Date: Tue Sep 25 13:23:34 2012 -0300 drm/i915: make sure we write all the DIP data bytes we need to clear the entire sdvo buffer to avoid upsetting the display. Since infoframe buffer writing is now a bit more elaborate, extract it into it's own function. This will be useful if we ever get around to properly update the ELD for sdvo. Also #define proper names for the two buffer indexes with fixed usage. v2: Cite the right commit above, spotted by Paulo Zanoni. v3: I'm too stupid to paste the right commit. v4: Ben Hutchings noticed that I've failed to handle an underflow in my loop logic, breaking it for i >= length + 8. Since I've just lost C programmer license, use his solution. Also, make the frustrated 0-base buffer size a notch more clear. Reported-and-tested-by: Jürg Billeter <j@bitron.ch> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com> Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@canonical.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++----------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo_regs.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) -- 1.7.9.5