From patchwork Sat Dec 1 19:04:52 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [C++] PR 54170 Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 09:04:52 -0000 From: Paolo Carlini X-Patchwork-Id: 203147 Message-Id: <50BA54D4.5070508@oracle.com> To: Jason Merrill Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Hi, On 12/01/2012 07:13 AM, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 11/30/2012 04:05 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote: >> @@ -219,10 +219,15 @@ cp_convert_to_pointer (tree type, tree expr, tsubs >> - expr = build_int_cst (type, 0); >> + expr = (TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (expr) >> + ? build_nop (type, expr) >> + : build_int_cst (type, 0)); > > This seems to rely on a nop being sufficient to convert from any null > pointer constant to the appropriate pointer type, which I don't think > is safe if the integer is smaller than a pointer. > > I'm also not sure if we want to rely on nullptr_t expressions actually > having the value 0. Thanks a lot. What about the below? I'm consistently building a COMPOUND_EXPR for the simpler plain pointers too; the hunk for pointers to member functions can be *very* simple: in fact I had already tried this solution but something else was wrong yesterday and seemed not to work, huumpf. Tested x86_64-linux. Thanks again, Paolo. //////////////////// Index: cp/cvt.c =================================================================== --- cp/cvt.c (revision 194020) +++ cp/cvt.c (working copy) @@ -215,16 +215,14 @@ cp_convert_to_pointer (tree type, tree expr, tsubs return build_ptrmemfunc (TYPE_PTRMEMFUNC_FN_TYPE (type), expr, 0, /*c_cast_p=*/false, complain); - if (TYPE_PTRDATAMEM_P (type)) - { - /* A NULL pointer-to-member is represented by -1, not by - zero. */ - expr = build_int_cst_type (type, -1); - } - else - expr = build_int_cst (type, 0); + /* A NULL pointer-to-data-member is represented by -1, not by + zero. */ + tree val = (TYPE_PTRDATAMEM_P (type) + ? build_int_cst_type (type, -1) + : build_int_cst (type, 0)); - return expr; + return (TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (expr) + ? build2 (COMPOUND_EXPR, type, expr, val) : val); } else if (TYPE_PTRMEM_P (type) && INTEGRAL_CODE_P (form)) { Index: cp/typeck.c =================================================================== --- cp/typeck.c (revision 194020) +++ cp/typeck.c (working copy) @@ -7567,7 +7567,7 @@ build_ptrmemfunc (tree type, tree pfn, int force, /* Handle null pointer to member function conversions. */ if (null_ptr_cst_p (pfn)) { - pfn = build_c_cast (input_location, type, nullptr_node); + pfn = build_c_cast (input_location, type, pfn); return build_ptrmemfunc1 (to_type, integer_zero_node, pfn); Index: testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-nullptr.C =================================================================== --- testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-nullptr.C (revision 0) +++ testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-nullptr.C (working copy) @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +// PR c++/54170 +// { dg-do run { target c++11 } } + +#include + +struct A; +typedef A* ptr; +typedef int (A::*pmf) (int); +typedef int (A::*pdm); + +int total; + +void add(int n) +{ + total += n; +} + +template +RType Call(Callable native_func, int arg) +{ + return native_func(arg); +} + +template +RType do_test(int delta) +{ + return Call([=](int delta) { add(delta); return nullptr; }, delta); +} + +template +void test() +{ + total = 0; + assert (!do_test(5)); + assert (total == 5); + assert (!do_test(20)); + assert (total == 25); + assert (!do_test(-256)); + assert (total == -231); +} + +int main() +{ + test(); + test(); + test(); +}