From patchwork Mon Nov 26 09:14:13 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Matthias Klose X-Patchwork-Id: 201644 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8BE52C008C for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 20:14:39 +1100 (EST) Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1354526080; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received: Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence: List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender: Delivered-To; bh=Kk+4xntrZ/9Mw33spAyu2NFl3ak=; b=UTjXowo6FEzyKF6 KZb9VodA7if1oRlvoDb2zLe3/B3sRZpIHKENPWGBdmTEkH3q59ajkcJzz6K/IhRn V70bB8RINwE9RuROPt7ZGNiQDSO8iLruwqLqrSAKHRcIn7iQmv2yjJ2Z/j/KGjtg wNQMWlt2LSr+hYc6VNL0C1cgsS08= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; b=pI9pHgFAxU2axRg0O/PqU+JDe1OutcuZx4VAgVZC5SQKKs4MzSab0VxeJ+VyMu BiviuZX91fsy0RYkobq5g+OlIIqVax4q9jFGr7EilKyUyVVdUNxcOf3jOo8iZbr7 WqNaBxN4ZATQV+XMPfLajFYsx7suWrwW4GnZBwPIFPEkc=; Received: (qmail 12501 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2012 09:14:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 12492 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Nov 2012 09:14:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST, KHOP_THREADED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from youngberry.canonical.com (HELO youngberry.canonical.com) (91.189.89.112) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 09:14:20 +0000 Received: from dslb-088-073-118-008.pools.arcor-ip.net ([88.73.118.8] helo=[192.168.42.216]) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tculf-0007bf-D4; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 09:14:19 +0000 Message-ID: <50B332E5.909@ubuntu.com> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:14:13 +0100 From: Matthias Klose User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: GCC Patches CC: Jan-Benedict Glaw Subject: [patch] Re: MULTIARCH_DIRNAME in gcc/config/rs6000/t-linux doesn't work References: <20121126085003.GP25927@lug-owl.de> In-Reply-To: <20121126085003.GP25927@lug-owl.de> Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Am 26.11.2012 09:50, schrieb Jan-Benedict Glaw: > The ifeq in this new makefile fragment doesn't work due to unbalanced > brackets. Fixed, and committing as obvious. Sorry, apparently I missed testing the non-multilib'd configuration. Matthias 2012-11-26 Matthias Klose * config/rs6000/t-linux (MULTIARCH_DIRNAME): Fix unbalanced parentheses. Index: config/rs6000/t-linux =================================================================== --- config/rs6000/t-linux (Revision 193804) +++ config/rs6000/t-linux (Arbeitskopie) @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ # do not define the multiarch name if configured for a soft-float cpu # or soft-float. -ifeq (,$(filter $(with_cpu),$(SOFT_FLOAT_CPUS))$(findstring soft,$(with_float)) +ifeq (,$(filter $(with_cpu),$(SOFT_FLOAT_CPUS))$(findstring soft,$(with_float))) MULTIARCH_DIRNAME = powerpc-linux-gnu endif