From patchwork Sun Nov 25 00:07:25 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Steven Bosscher X-Patchwork-Id: 201493 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F5522C0090 for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 11:08:20 +1100 (EST) Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1354406902; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received:Received: MIME-Version:Received:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date: Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc:Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence: List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender: Delivered-To; bh=PiQFUhTABQlsuEw0oKsmz2jFN/Y=; b=jLmBFkL+8J1ML0y 1gEkZxXLPWD27DyBrAvkwK9NGLc8L1t1LSoGVSDpR3noW6134kzEasTduroAVPzl /V8IEM9ZksAFLuGAat7e8w+vsDHroChyxQV8roRdVCQrJT3Id8wFOiHutNkaYFaB mUq6vDDfaz4TbHR+cwW6H864nfqE= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:Received:Received:MIME-Version:Received:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc:Content-Type:X-IsSubscribed:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; b=XXyMtuPmsLtIr01ol/zYRnO3NFTwsffLlszdk1PH4Lt3fU8Ul0ilz2Nsgg9DBW UmuejTJKain8MojoaPcJxHKE102EluKhHzL8J5R/2Qq9ordd3e0qmMPqTXCysh4H KjtcbgrOld1b+eINIh2LVciHDkENalWUDdQN6InBQQm2g=; Received: (qmail 1730 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2012 00:08:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 1686 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Nov 2012 00:08:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, KHOP_RCVD_TRUST, KHOP_THREADED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-lb0-f175.google.com) (209.85.217.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 00:08:07 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f175.google.com with SMTP id gg13so5074589lbb.20 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:08:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.50.106 with SMTP id b10mr3394310lbo.122.1353802085538; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:08:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.88.99 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:07:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Steven Bosscher Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 01:07:25 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove unused DELAY_SLOTS_FOR_EPILOGUE target macro To: Hans-Peter Nilsson Cc: GCC Patches X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > On Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Steven Bosscher wrote: >> Hello, >> >> The DELAY_SLOTS_FOR_EPILOGUE target macro, and the related >> ELIGIBLE_FOR_EPILOGUE_DELAY macro, are unused. The attached patch >> removes them. >> >> OK for trunk? > > Obviously; Jeff Law preapproved their removal long ago. > (I forgot about it.) But please poison them too! Right, committed with this additional hunk: Ciao! Steven Index: system.h =================================================================== --- system.h (revision 193766) +++ system.h (working copy) @@ -902,7 +902,8 @@ extern void fancy_abort (const char *, i UNALIGNED_LONG_ASM_OP UNALIGNED_DOUBLE_INT_ASM_OP \ USE_COMMON_FOR_ONE_ONLY IFCVT_EXTRA_FIELDS IFCVT_INIT_EXTRA_FIELDS \ CASE_USE_BIT_TESTS FIXUNS_TRUNC_LIKE_FIX_TRUNC \ - GO_IF_MODE_DEPENDENT_ADDRESS + GO_IF_MODE_DEPENDENT_ADDRESS DELAY_SLOTS_FOR_EPILOGUE \ + ELIGIBLE_FOR_EPILOGUE_DELAY /* Hooks that are no longer used. */ #pragma GCC poison LANG_HOOKS_FUNCTION_MARK LANG_HOOKS_FUNCTION_FREE \