Patchwork [GIT,PULL,v2] at91: fixes for 3.7-rc7

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Nicolas Ferre
Date Nov. 20, 2012, 8:59 a.m.
Message ID <50AB466F.5010500@atmel.com>
Download mbox
Permalink /patch/200397/
State New
Headers show

Pull-request

git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-fixes

Comments

Nicolas Ferre - Nov. 20, 2012, 8:59 a.m.
Arnd, Olof,

Just for the record, I do not want to put pressure at a such late time in
the 3.7-rc process. So, I just reworked that pull-request because the previous
one was wrong:
- wrong patch content (DT nodes with wrong size)
- not all tags in patches (Jean-Christophe and Arnd tags were missing...)

Just to start from a sane base if I have to rebase this work for 3.8, I let you know
that I have updated this tag...

The following changes since commit 641f3ce64b050961d454a0716bb6dbf528315aac:

  ARM: at91/usbh: fix overcurrent gpio setup (2012-11-16 10:46:29 +0100)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-fixes

for you to fetch changes up to 6a342d1ee6ff7d5b3e5a0665457f1772e7fe640a:

  ARM: at91/dts: add nodes for atmel hsmci controllers for atmel boards (2012-11-20 09:51:07 +0100)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Add entries for enabling the use of sd/mmc driver on AT91.
Those entries where missing for device tree use on these
platforms.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Ludovic Desroches (3):
      ARM: at91: add clocks for DT entries
      ARM: at91/dts: add nodes for atmel hsmci controllers for atmel SOCs
      ARM: at91/dts: add nodes for atmel hsmci controllers for atmel boards

 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9260.dtsi          |  9 +++++++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi          | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263ek.dts         | 10 ++++++++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g20ek_2mmc.dts    | 12 ++++++++++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g20ek_common.dtsi |  9 +++++++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g25ek.dts         | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g45.dtsi          | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9m10g45ek.dts      | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9n12.dtsi          |  9 +++++++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9n12ek.dts         |  9 +++++++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi           | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9260.c            |  1 +
 arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263.c            |  2 ++
 arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c            |  2 ++
 arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9n12.c            |  1 +
 arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9x5.c             |  2 ++
 16 files changed, 157 insertions(+)

Bye,
Olof Johansson - Nov. 21, 2012, 7:03 a.m.
Hi,


On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 09:59:27AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Arnd, Olof,
> 
> Just for the record, I do not want to put pressure at a such late time in
> the 3.7-rc process. So, I just reworked that pull-request because the previous
> one was wrong:
> - wrong patch content (DT nodes with wrong size)
> - not all tags in patches (Jean-Christophe and Arnd tags were missing...)
> 
> Just to start from a sane base if I have to rebase this work for 3.8, I let you know
> that I have updated this tag...
> 
> The following changes since commit 641f3ce64b050961d454a0716bb6dbf528315aac:
> 
>   ARM: at91/usbh: fix overcurrent gpio setup (2012-11-16 10:46:29 +0100)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-fixes

The new patches seem to belong in an at91/dt branch, not in a fixes one.

I can pull in the previous fixes branch as an at91/fixes-non-critical for 3.8
if you want. There's no need to rebase them for this, is there? What is the
pinctrl dependency that you are talking about, are some of these patches needed
as prerequisites for pinctrl changes or the other way around?

Sorry if I've missed more elaborate emails on this and are asking repeat
questions. ;)

-Olof
Nicolas Ferre - Nov. 21, 2012, 11:25 a.m.
On 11/21/2012 08:03 AM, Olof Johansson :
> Hi,
> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 09:59:27AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> Arnd, Olof,
>>
>> Just for the record, I do not want to put pressure at a such late time in
>> the 3.7-rc process. So, I just reworked that pull-request because the previous
>> one was wrong:
>> - wrong patch content (DT nodes with wrong size)
>> - not all tags in patches (Jean-Christophe and Arnd tags were missing...)
>>
>> Just to start from a sane base if I have to rebase this work for 3.8, I let you know
>> that I have updated this tag...
>>
>> The following changes since commit 641f3ce64b050961d454a0716bb6dbf528315aac:
>>
>>   ARM: at91/usbh: fix overcurrent gpio setup (2012-11-16 10:46:29 +0100)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>>   git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-fixes
> 
> The new patches seem to belong in an at91/dt branch, not in a fixes one.
> 
> I can pull in the previous fixes branch as an at91/fixes-non-critical for 3.8
> if you want. There's no need to rebase them for this, is there? What is the
> pinctrl dependency that you are talking about, are some of these patches needed
> as prerequisites for pinctrl changes or the other way around?
> 
> Sorry if I've missed more elaborate emails on this and are asking repeat
> questions. ;)

No worries Olof, I might have been more precise in the subject of my
email: I have made up my mind and consider this material for 3.8.

As for the relation with pinctrl, we have made big modification to the
layout of some dtsi/dts there and it would make everyones' life easier
if we queue these dt/mmc changes on top of the current pinctrl tree...
Moreover, Jean-Christophe plans to add the pinctrl part of these
additions on top of the modification present in this pull-request: one
more reason to queue them in pinctrl git tree.

So, in brief: forget this pull-request (and the one that it replaces
obviously).

Thanks, bye,