diff mbox

[PING] PR c++/54401 - Confusing diagnostics about type-alias at class scope

Message ID 87ehjstfrx.fsf@seketeli.org
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Dodji Seketeli Nov. 17, 2012, 3:23 p.m. UTC 
Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> a écrit:

> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Would it work to just do a cp_parser_commit_to_tentative_parse after we see
>> the '='?

I guess you mean in cp_parser_alias_declaration like in the updated
patch below?

> I like that solution better.

Ok, thanks.
 
I just had to adjust the call to cp_parser_alias_declaration when called
in  the context of a tentative parse, to handle the case where an error
occurs before we reach the '=' token; which means that the tentative
parse can still be cancelled.

Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu against trunk.

gcc/cp/

	* parser.c (cp_parser_alias_declaration): Commit to tentative
	parse when see the '=' token.  Get out if the type-id is invalid.
	Update function comment.
	(cp_parser_member_declaration): Don't try to parse a using
	declaration if we know that we expected an alias declaration; that
	is, if we see the '=' token after the identifier.

gcc/testsuite/

	* g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-28.C: New test.
	* g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-16.C: Update.
---
 gcc/cp/parser.c                            | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-16.C |  2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-28.C |  7 +++++++
 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-28.C

Comments

Jason Merrill Dec. 4, 2012, 4:50 p.m. UTC | #1 
Oops, thought I had sent this before.

On 11/17/2012 10:23 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> -	  if (cp_parser_parse_definitely (parser))
> +	  /* Note that if we actually see the '=' token after the
> +	     identifier, cp_parser_alias_declaration commits the
> +	     tentative parse.  In that case, we really expects an
> +	     alias-declaration.  Otherwise, we expect a using
> +	     declaration.  */
> +	  alias_decl_expected =
> +	    !cp_parser_uncommitted_to_tentative_parse_p (parser);
> +	  cp_parser_parse_definitely (parser);

Maybe just check whether decl is error_mark_node?

> +  if (type == error_mark_node)
> +    return error_mark_node;

I think for error-recovery we might want to 
cp_parser_skip_to_end_of_block_or_statement as well.

Jason
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c
index 7107134..2b76670 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c
@@ -15260,7 +15260,11 @@  cp_parser_using_declaration (cp_parser* parser,
 /* Parse an alias-declaration.
 
    alias-declaration:
-     using identifier attribute-specifier-seq [opt] = type-id  */
+     using identifier attribute-specifier-seq [opt] = type-id
+
+   Note that if this function is used in the context of a tentative
+   parse, it commits the currently active tentative parse after it
+   sees the '=' token.  */
 
 static tree
 cp_parser_alias_declaration (cp_parser* parser)
@@ -15293,6 +15297,8 @@  cp_parser_alias_declaration (cp_parser* parser)
   if (cp_parser_error_occurred (parser))
     return error_mark_node;
 
+  cp_parser_commit_to_tentative_parse (parser);
+
   /* Now we are going to parse the type-id of the declaration.  */
 
   /*
@@ -15322,6 +15328,9 @@  cp_parser_alias_declaration (cp_parser* parser)
   if (parser->num_template_parameter_lists)
     parser->type_definition_forbidden_message = saved_message;
 
+  if (type == error_mark_node)
+    return error_mark_node;
+
   cp_parser_require (parser, CPP_SEMICOLON, RT_SEMICOLON);
 
   if (cp_parser_error_occurred (parser))
@@ -19058,9 +19067,19 @@  cp_parser_member_declaration (cp_parser* parser)
       else
 	{
 	  tree decl;
+	  bool alias_decl_expected;
 	  cp_parser_parse_tentatively (parser);
 	  decl = cp_parser_alias_declaration (parser);
-	  if (cp_parser_parse_definitely (parser))
+	  /* Note that if we actually see the '=' token after the
+	     identifier, cp_parser_alias_declaration commits the
+	     tentative parse.  In that case, we really expects an
+	     alias-declaration.  Otherwise, we expect a using
+	     declaration.  */
+	  alias_decl_expected =
+	    !cp_parser_uncommitted_to_tentative_parse_p (parser);
+	  cp_parser_parse_definitely (parser);
+
+	  if (alias_decl_expected)
 	    finish_member_declaration (decl);
 	  else
 	    cp_parser_using_declaration (parser,
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-16.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-16.C
index d66660a..ce6ad0a 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-16.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-16.C
@@ -23,6 +23,6 @@  template<class T>
 using A3 =
     enum B3 {b = 0;}; //{ dg-error "types may not be defined in alias template" }
 
-A3<int> a3;
+A3<int> a3; // { dg-error "'A3' does not name a type" }
 
 int main() { }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-28.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-28.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..086b5e5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-28.C
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ 
+// Origin: PR c++/54401
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template<typename>
+struct X {
+    using type = T; // { dg-error "expected type-specifier|does not name a type" }
+};