From patchwork Wed Nov 14 21:45:57 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Uros Bizjak X-Patchwork-Id: 199030 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2204D2C0087 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 08:46:17 +1100 (EST) Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1353534378; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received: MIME-Version:Received:Received:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To: Cc:Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; bh=5MFloYR RxlcYJ6LpsxJX8lmcnvY=; b=EYDY+04A3k2n6zozGr2N27vecQa5a6uk7ILEV7I 5TR+g7CDX108i3ktSc0ctpu7v8RdCNpJLA9Q3X+/y7h1VJJxuG2FL9WvH7nMiaSK F64VezDTH5Hnq0O0Phoqro2mJGx2bASN/8S6MWzdpGwClEPEczeudEjJx/yda5ku +a0Y= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:Received:MIME-Version:Received:Received:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; b=Efp4ohM9q/Zniemb6E30qsaUWyINCiSEQ/K0QXRA43Lwm9yXylCJDT3ArVLOTo VlIW0c9FBptkrUDJiV5mYAeGUMAqK4KTmvEuBXWNUynS+EfnoWEm6MJzbbP1ezJU w0gw7M1bHMbk3nUHOTvwYLSe1CjxG1xC9yXx3sL+EhmlM=; Received: (qmail 3220 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2012 21:46:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 3194 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Nov 2012 21:46:02 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, KHOP_RCVD_TRUST, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE, TW_ZJ X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-pb0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-pb0-f47.google.com) (209.85.160.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:45:58 +0000 Received: by mail-pb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id ro12so636447pbb.20 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:45:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.197.71 with SMTP id is7mr75427897pbc.79.1352929558065; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:45:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.246.232 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:45:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:45:57 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: [PATCH, libstdc++]: Adjust expected mangling for 128bit long double targets From: Uros Bizjak To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Hello! Attached patch adjusts expected demangling strings of testsuite/26_numerics/complex/abi_tag.cc for 128bit long-double targets. 2012-11-14 Uros Bizjak * testsuite/26_numerics/complex/abi_tag.cc: Adjust expected demangling for 128bit long-double targets. Tested on alphaev68-pc-linux-gnu (128bit long double target) and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline? Uros. Index: testsuite/26_numerics/complex/abi_tag.cc =================================================================== --- testsuite/26_numerics/complex/abi_tag.cc (revision 193502) +++ testsuite/26_numerics/complex/abi_tag.cc (working copy) @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ float (std::complex::*p1)() const = &std::complex::real; // { dg-final { scan-assembler "_ZNKSt7complexIdE4realB5cxx11Ev" } } double (std::complex::*p2)() const = &std::complex::real; -// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_ZNKSt7complexIeE4realB5cxx11Ev" } } +// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_ZNKSt7complexI\[eg\]E4realB5cxx11Ev" } } long double (std::complex::*p3)() const = &std::complex::real; // { dg-final { scan-assembler "_ZNKSt7complexIiE4realB5cxx11Ev" } } @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ float (std::complex::*p5)() const = &std::complex::imag; // { dg-final { scan-assembler "_ZNKSt7complexIdE4imagB5cxx11Ev" } } double (std::complex::*p6)() const = &std::complex::imag; -// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_ZNKSt7complexIeE4imagB5cxx11Ev" } } +// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_ZNKSt7complexI\[eg\]E4imagB5cxx11Ev" } } long double (std::complex::*p7)() const = &std::complex::imag; // { dg-final { scan-assembler "_ZNKSt7complexIiE4imagB5cxx11Ev" } }