| Message ID | 20121112185214.GA26628@debian-saurabh-64.vyatta.com |
|---|---|
| State | Changes Requested, archived |
| Delegated to: | David Miller |
| Headers | show |
There is no such actual patch number "00/00". Please number your patch properly and resubmit, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c b/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c index 1831092..858fddf 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c @@ -338,12 +338,17 @@ static int vti_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb) if (tunnel != NULL) { struct pcpu_tstats *tstats; + if (!xfrm4_policy_check(NULL, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb)) + return -1; + tstats = this_cpu_ptr(tunnel->dev->tstats); u64_stats_update_begin(&tstats->syncp); tstats->rx_packets++; tstats->rx_bytes += skb->len; u64_stats_update_end(&tstats->syncp); + skb->mark = 0; + secpath_reset(skb); skb->dev = tunnel->dev; return 1; }
With the latest kernel there are two things that must be done post decryption so that the packet are forwarded. 1. Remove the mark from the packet. This will cause the packet to not match the ipsec-policy again. However doing this causes the post-decryption check to fail also and the packet will get dropped. (cat /proc/net/xfrm_stat). 2. Remove the sp association in the skbuff so that no policy check is done on the packet for VTI tunnels. Due to #2 above we must now do a security-policy check in the vti rcv path prior to resetting the mark in the skbuff. Signed-off-by: Saurabh Mohan <saurabh.mohan@vyatta.com> Reported-by: Ruben Herold <ruben@puettmann.net> --- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html