From patchwork Sun Nov 11 09:58:41 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Gerald Pfeifer X-Patchwork-Id: 198245 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B29352C0093 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 20:58:58 +1100 (EST) Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1353232741; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received:Date: From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender: Delivered-To; bh=RokYuUOnSabYqjv0YfgINmD6MEI=; b=kmgk4gYJ2XPKwp/ IsJND/3FS2YGRpH2+G5IAbw4AAE5UbS1Xtt+J/Y2P+54a+bWLWpsRDSzAbrpLx4F cpJMNqmOuEK6WhA0Z09dC+gT8QRuzSaJDfcbhdFam6+vGhQ/+b2d2UF7J0v5NLMY 8Ej8xGtplzfvyI5jkz6Gc/9GPrPw= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:Received:Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-IsSubscribed:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; b=OwhTHS6IouUxNE52ZxHH/WKy+bk0lcROAQ3UDTLrYas5JNazSQdWTXOsT5Lb+I S09av2349WiNL7cnWfGf5g9OP/Outp3FwnG90+2o5QqD4hodAVEgYmsZFe2/2fMe SKI4c4C+TAXmik68klenxjtJIZ2wkfbWdEYcvR0SR/+dw=; Received: (qmail 6027 invoked by alias); 11 Nov 2012 09:58:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 6011 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Nov 2012 09:58:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ainaz.pair.com (HELO ainaz.pair.com) (209.68.2.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:58:45 +0000 Received: from [10.53.197.40] (unknown [80.187.201.11]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BEA2C3F40F; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 04:58:42 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 10:58:41 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Jonathan Wakely , libstdc++ cc: gcc-patches Subject: Re: [doc,libstdc++] Link maintenance for the libstdc++ manual In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org On Mon, 5 Nov 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > I'd use http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/select.html Thanks, Jonathan. I committed the patch below. > Are you sure the other links haven't already been fixed in the > libstdc++ sources? > > The copies on the website are usually fairly out of date. Yes, you're right! What can we do about that? Who triggers an update / how can we do this more regularily? I have some vague memories that Benjamin was pushing for this a year or two ago as well. Doesn't have to be daily, but could we do this whenever someone regenerates libstdc++/doc/html? Gerald 2012-11-11 Gerald Pfeifer * doc/xml/manual/policy_data_structures.xml: Update reference for select. Index: doc/xml/manual/policy_data_structures.xml =================================================================== --- doc/xml/manual/policy_data_structures.xml (revision 193404) +++ doc/xml/manual/policy_data_structures.xml (working copy) @@ -6363,7 +6363,7 @@ <link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" - xlink:href="http://www.scit.wlv.ac.uk/cgi-bin/mansec?3C+select"> + xlink:href="http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/select.html"> select </link>