Patchwork [trans-mem,rfc] Improvements to uninstrumented code paths

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Richard Henderson
Date Nov. 7, 2012, 11:03 p.m.
Message ID <509AE8CC.4050602@redhat.com>
Download mbox | patch
Permalink /patch/197737/
State New
Headers show

Comments

Richard Henderson - Nov. 7, 2012, 11:03 p.m.
On 11/07/2012 03:01 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Thoughts?

Now with 100% more patches per mail!


r~

Patch

From 9253d4138a0cdb76c40345a1e32694968f375a86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 14:36:01 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] tm: Optimize nested transactions in an uninstrumented
 code path

        * trans-mem.c (tm_region_init_0): Consider all edges when looking
        for the entry_block.
        (collect_bb2reg): Handle uninstrumented only transactions.
        (generate_tm_state): Likewise.
        (expand_transaction): Likewise.
        (execute_tm_memopt): Likewise.
        (ipa_uninstrument_transaction0): Convert nested transactions in
        the uninstrumented code path to uninstrumented only.
---
 gcc/ChangeLog   |  9 ++++++++
 gcc/trans-mem.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index dc1909c..8555e8c 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,14 @@ 
 2012-11-07  Richard Henderson  <rth@redhat.com>
 
+	* trans-mem.c (tm_region_init_0): Consider all edges when looking
+	for the entry_block.
+	(collect_bb2reg): Handle uninstrumented only transactions.
+	(generate_tm_state): Likewise.
+	(expand_transaction): Likewise.
+	(execute_tm_memopt): Likewise.
+	(ipa_uninstrument_transaction0): Convert nested transactions in
+	the uninstrumented code path to uninstrumented only.
+
 	* trans-mem.c (ipa_uninstrument_transaction0): Rename from
 	ipa_uninstrument_transaction.
 	(ipa_uninstrument_transaction): New function.
diff --git a/gcc/trans-mem.c b/gcc/trans-mem.c
index 478ce71..c0987dc 100644
--- a/gcc/trans-mem.c
+++ b/gcc/trans-mem.c
@@ -868,10 +868,13 @@  typedef struct tm_log_entry
 {
   /* Address to save.  */
   tree addr;
+
   /* Entry block for the transaction this address occurs in.  */
   basic_block entry_block;
+
   /* Dominating statements the store occurs in.  */
   gimple_vec stmts;
+
   /* Initially, while we are building the log, we place a nonzero
      value here to mean that this address *will* be saved with a
      save/restore sequence.  Later, when generating the save sequence
@@ -1721,8 +1724,8 @@  struct tm_region
   /* Return value from BUILT_IN_TM_START.  */
   tree tm_state;
 
-  /* The entry block to this region.  This will always be the first
-     block of the body of the transaction.  */
+  /* The entry block to the instrumented code path for this region.
+     This will always be the first block of the body of the transaction.  */
   basic_block entry_block;
 
   /* The first block after an expanded call to _ITM_beginTransaction.  */
@@ -1732,7 +1735,7 @@  struct tm_region
      These blocks are still a part of the region (i.e., the border is
      inclusive). Note that this set is only complete for paths in the CFG
      starting at ENTRY_BLOCK, and that there is no exit block recorded for
-     the edge to the "over" label.  */
+     the TM_ABORT edge nor for the body of the uninstrumented code path.  */
   bitmap exit_blocks;
 
   /* The set of all blocks that have an TM_IRREVOCABLE call.  */
@@ -1779,11 +1782,19 @@  tm_region_init_0 (struct tm_region *outer, basic_block bb, gimple stmt)
   region->original_transaction_was_outer = false;
   region->tm_state = NULL;
 
-  /* There are either one or two edges out of the block containing
-     the GIMPLE_TRANSACTION, one to the actual region and one to the
-     "over" label if the region contains an abort.  The former will
-     always be the one marked FALLTHRU.  */
-  region->entry_block = FALLTHRU_EDGE (bb)->dest;
+  // There are three possible edges out of GIMPLE_TRANSACTION.
+  // The "entry_block" always refers to the instrumented code path.
+  region->entry_block = NULL;
+  {
+    edge_iterator ei;
+    edge e;
+    FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, bb->succs)
+      if (!(e->flags & (EDGE_TM_ABORT | EDGE_TM_UNINSTRUMENTED)))
+	{
+	  region->entry_block = e->dest;
+	  break;
+	}
+  }
 
   region->exit_blocks = BITMAP_ALLOC (&tm_obstack);
   region->irr_blocks = BITMAP_ALLOC (&tm_obstack);
@@ -2453,6 +2464,10 @@  collect_bb2reg (struct tm_region *region, void *data)
   unsigned int i;
   basic_block bb;
 
+  // Don't run on transactions with only uninstrumented code paths.
+  if (region->entry_block == NULL)
+    return NULL;
+
   queue = get_tm_region_blocks (region->entry_block,
 				region->exit_blocks,
 				region->irr_blocks,
@@ -2564,9 +2579,8 @@  expand_transaction (struct tm_region *region, void *data ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
 	  uninst_edge = e;
 	else
 	  inst_edge = e;
-        if (e->flags & EDGE_FALLTHRU)
-	  fallthru_edge = e;
       }
+    fallthru_edge = (inst_edge ? inst_edge : uninst_edge);
   }
 
   /* ??? There are plenty of bits here we're not computing.  */
@@ -2780,7 +2794,7 @@  generate_tm_state (struct tm_region *region, void *data ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
 
   // Reset the subcode, post optimizations.  We'll fill this in
   // again as we process blocks.
-  if (region->exit_blocks)
+  if (region->entry_block && region->exit_blocks)
     {
       unsigned int subcode
 	= gimple_transaction_subcode (region->transaction_stmt);
@@ -3695,6 +3709,10 @@  execute_tm_memopt (void)
       size_t i;
       basic_block bb;
 
+      // Don't run on transactions with only uninstrumented code paths.
+      if (region->entry_block == NULL)
+	continue;
+
       bitmap_obstack_initialize (&tm_memopt_obstack);
 
       /* Save all BBs for the current region.  */
@@ -3894,15 +3912,33 @@  ipa_uninstrument_transaction0 (struct tm_region *region,
   int n = VEC_length (basic_block, queue);
   basic_block *new_bbs = XNEWVEC (basic_block, n);
 
+  // We will have a GIMPLE_ATOMIC with 3 possible edges out of it.
+  //   a) EDGE_FALLTHRU to the instrumented blocks,
+  //   b) EDGE_TM_UNINSTRUMENTED to the uninstrumented blocks,
+  //   c) EDGE_TM_ABORT out of the transaction
+
   copy_bbs (VEC_address (basic_block, queue), n, new_bbs,
 	    NULL, 0, NULL, NULL, transaction_bb);
   edge e = make_edge (transaction_bb, new_bbs[0], EDGE_TM_UNINSTRUMENTED);
   add_phi_args_after_copy (new_bbs, n, e);
 
-  // Now we will have a GIMPLE_ATOMIC with 3 possible edges out of it.
-  //   a) EDGE_FALLTHRU into the transaction
-  //   b) EDGE_TM_ABORT out of the transaction
-  //   c) EDGE_TM_UNINSTRUMENTED into the uninstrumented blocks.
+  // Note that the region that we copied can contain transactions.  Given
+  // that these are on a code path that we've just designated uninstrumented,
+  // there's no point in having these nested transactions have instrumented
+  // code paths.  Which means that there's no point processing these new
+  // transactions into new tm_regions so that they could be processed by
+  // ipa_tm_scan_calls_transaction.  What we would like to do is change the
+  // fallthru (instrumented) edges to uninstrumented.
+  for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i)
+    {
+      gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_last_bb (new_bbs[i]);
+      if (!gsi_end_p (gsi)
+          && gimple_code (gsi_stmt (gsi)) == GIMPLE_TRANSACTION)
+	{
+	  edge e = FALLTHRU_EDGE (new_bbs[i]);
+	  e->flags = EDGE_TM_UNINSTRUMENTED;
+	}
+    }
 
   free (new_bbs);
 }
-- 
1.7.11.7