From patchwork Wed Nov 7 12:40:05 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Uros Bizjak X-Patchwork-Id: 197656 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F2CCE2C0168 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 23:40:21 +1100 (EST) Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1352896822; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received: MIME-Version:Received:Received:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To: Cc:Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; bh=I8GoRZO +qASJPQYvO6pmIv1bYyM=; b=v5wsxmZ2V75znm+xc/EHNusSGfND452wftyfSlX F7tRRHlZWR1HlN1Zv+Y41/byrXPOVShKqHakmvLUpdWgCpwYntmSqRyP/F8lxRuk cLzZ8mhh8OlXhZ6LA/0d8MmzEZCYCXFwsIc1R6MYmLsN79qz9LMziNjJstX2Airr tLDg= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:Received:MIME-Version:Received:Received:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; b=fqaousWDgXdXTeRra73UpuInoL6ZLVTp51XseAi/e/HIKC8AKNJRRFHBiauYWs 05xmoqM1okunXo4S5WyMAXcKnGu4/owt9oJLhfddjwJ0zV1+paSxneBoqlfUSjla 1fwsLxgKD338Zx578WKGG6l29hD6rAcjpQ4uryekdSZQY=; Received: (qmail 11211 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2012 12:40:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 11198 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Nov 2012 12:40:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, KHOP_RCVD_TRUST, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-pb0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-pb0-f47.google.com) (209.85.160.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 12:40:06 +0000 Received: by mail-pb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id ro12so1117268pbb.20 for ; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 04:40:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.66.87.226 with SMTP id bb2mr12020346pab.57.1352292005815; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 04:40:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.246.232 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 04:40:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 13:40:05 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: [PATCH, testsuite]: UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cunroll-1.c From: Uros Bizjak To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: jh@suse.cz Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Hello! Attached patch addresses UNRESOLVED part of cunroll-1.c test failure, but with fixed dump filename, I got: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cunroll-1.c scan-tree-dump cunrolli "Unrolled loop 1 completely .duplicated 1 times.." I'll leave this to Honza to decide. Uros. .duplicated 1 times.." "cunrolli"} } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Last iteration exit edge was proved true." "cunrolli"} } */ /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "cunrolli" } } */ Index: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cunroll-1.c =================================================================== --- gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cunroll-1.c (revision 193292) +++ gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cunroll-1.c (working copy) @@ -8,6 +8,6 @@ a[i]=5; } /* Array bounds says the loop will not roll much. */ -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Unrolled loop 1 completely .duplicated 1 times.." "cunroll"} } */ -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Last iteration exit edge was proved true." "cunroll"} } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Unrolled loop 1 completely