From patchwork Thu Nov 1 22:22:55 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Gerald Pfeifer X-Patchwork-Id: 196394 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1C932C034B for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 09:23:04 +1100 (EST) Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1352413386; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received:Date: From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; bh=lcRfDaWJoNNHSjDIiZDE i3g7k4w=; b=l8+vSHEaAnNuWecAlzdvLbMRo+46oha26z/ADkHA3kAw/1gshDxj 3MhzpRtXS6iJnE4mHM/HfFsuA3d0H8/GMQ2MJGrAnl0jnaV2RDjbJN92u0zOi/GP B2B8pxJqqeErdtxIzsEgkWKRp+G0fWxDWkBCFbLfTS6I9FEmLaa/C/w= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-IsSubscribed:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; b=CTHlKm/a5vn5pLEJxIEx2th7wGSv5udSFhuYUEKZnO68wYXzItOLGC0gKecVf2 u5gw7A47UOJAQ9spdTBP9xCQX8V1AdaJnExzHrM64olvRYI0kztTBo8GG0DszTL7 YgEKZmmN0r5SJhI1nKVKdlryON3sEKJIj0AYGhiXkXHd0=; Received: (qmail 6632 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2012 22:23:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 6618 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Nov 2012 22:23:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-50.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,TW_GC X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ainaz.pair.com (HELO ainaz.pair.com) (209.68.2.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 22:22:55 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.129] (vie-188-118-240-184.dsl.sil.at [188.118.240.184]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C511D3F40F; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 18:22:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 23:22:55 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, java-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [wwwdocs,Java] comparison of libgcj with Kaffe link is gone Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org The regular comparison with Kaffe is gone after the restructuring/ move to github, and I could not find any replacement URL. I applied this patch. If any of you has a new URL, we can resurrect. Gerald 2012-11-01 Gerald Pfeifer * status.html: Remove comparison with Kaffe. Index: status.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/java/status.html,v retrieving revision 1.31 diff -u -3 -p -r1.31 status.html --- status.html 1 Nov 2011 14:07:02 -0000 1.31 +++ status.html 1 Nov 2012 22:16:48 -0000 @@ -39,11 +39,6 @@ you should not (yet) rely on their corre

Implemented Packages

-

You can also see a -comparison of libgcj with the JDK. This is updated nightly. It -is run against the cvs trunk, and includes GNU Crypto in its analysis. -This is the most up-to-date analysis of API differences.

-
java.applet
Believed to be complete, but note that without a functional AWT