Patchwork [wwwdocs,Java] comparison of libgcj with Kaffe link is gone

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Gerald Pfeifer
Date Nov. 1, 2012, 10:22 p.m.
Message ID <alpine.LNX.2.00.1211012321040.2266@tuna.site>
Download mbox | patch
Permalink /patch/196394/
State New
Headers show

Comments

Gerald Pfeifer - Nov. 1, 2012, 10:22 p.m.
The regular comparison with Kaffe is gone after the restructuring/
move to github, and I could not find any replacement URL.

I applied this patch. If any of you has a new URL, we can resurrect.

Gerald

2012-11-01  Gerald Pfeifer  <gerald@pfeifer.com>

	* status.html: Remove comparison with Kaffe.
Dr Andrew John Hughes - Nov. 15, 2012, 1:26 a.m.
----- Original Message -----
> The regular comparison with Kaffe is gone after the restructuring/
> move to github, and I could not find any replacement URL.
> 
> I applied this patch. If any of you has a new URL, we can resurrect.
> 
> Gerald
> 
> 2012-11-01  Gerald Pfeifer  <gerald@pfeifer.com>
> 
> 	* status.html: Remove comparison with Kaffe.
> 
> Index: status.html
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/java/status.html,v
> retrieving revision 1.31
> diff -u -3 -p -r1.31 status.html
> --- status.html	1 Nov 2011 14:07:02 -0000	1.31
> +++ status.html	1 Nov 2012 22:16:48 -0000
> @@ -39,11 +39,6 @@ you should not (yet) rely on their corre
>  
>  <h2 id="packages">Implemented Packages</h2>
>  
> -<p>You can also see <a href="http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/japi/">a
> -comparison of libgcj with the JDK</a>.  This is updated nightly.  It
> -is run against the cvs trunk, and includes GNU Crypto in its
> analysis.
> -This is the most up-to-date analysis of API differences.  </p>
> -
>  <dl>
>  <dt class="package">java.applet</dt>
>  <dd>Believed to be complete, but note that without a functional AWT
> 

I'd have to look at the context of this, but (assuming I can actually
get my webserver to stay up reliably) I have more up-to-date comparisons
on there, comparing OpenJDK with GNU Classpath.  GCJ could easily be added
and listed in the docs.
Gerald Pfeifer - Nov. 19, 2012, 3:14 p.m.
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>> --- status.html	1 Nov 2011 14:07:02 -0000	1.31
>> +++ status.html	1 Nov 2012 22:16:48 -0000
>> -<p>You can also see <a href="http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/japi/">a
>> -comparison of libgcj with the JDK</a>.  This is updated nightly.  It
>> -is run against the cvs trunk, and includes GNU Crypto in its analysis.
>> -This is the most up-to-date analysis of API differences.  </p>
> I'd have to look at the context of this, but (assuming I can actually
> get my webserver to stay up reliably) I have more up-to-date comparisons
> on there, comparing OpenJDK with GNU Classpath.  GCJ could easily be added
> and listed in the docs.

Absolutely, if you can have a reliable link, I'd be happy to see
this added.

Gerald

Patch

Index: status.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/java/status.html,v
retrieving revision 1.31
diff -u -3 -p -r1.31 status.html
--- status.html	1 Nov 2011 14:07:02 -0000	1.31
+++ status.html	1 Nov 2012 22:16:48 -0000
@@ -39,11 +39,6 @@  you should not (yet) rely on their corre
 
 <h2 id="packages">Implemented Packages</h2>
 
-<p>You can also see <a href="http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/japi/">a
-comparison of libgcj with the JDK</a>.  This is updated nightly.  It
-is run against the cvs trunk, and includes GNU Crypto in its analysis.
-This is the most up-to-date analysis of API differences.  </p>
-
 <dl>
 <dt class="package">java.applet</dt>
 <dd>Believed to be complete, but note that without a functional AWT