From patchwork Mon Oct 29 04:30:58 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Zhiyong Wu X-Patchwork-Id: 194794 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25082C00A7 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:34:51 +1100 (EST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756039Ab2J2EdB (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:33:01 -0400 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.149]:36843 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757915Ab2J2Ec7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:32:59 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e31.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 22:32:58 -0600 Received: from d03dlp01.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.202.177) by e31.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 22:32:56 -0600 Received: from d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.107]) by d03dlp01.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4347CC40002; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 22:32:54 -0600 (MDT) Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id q9T4WsTD227830; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 22:32:54 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id q9T4WrfI025790; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 22:32:54 -0600 Received: from us.ibm.com ([9.115.122.193]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with SMTP id q9T4Wm9x025482; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 22:32:49 -0600 Received: by us.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:32:44 +0800 From: zwu.kernel@gmail.com To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxram@linux.vnet.ibm.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, david@fromorbit.com, tytso@mit.edu, cmm@us.ibm.com, wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, wenqing.lz@taobao.com Subject: [RFC v4+ hot_track 16/19] btrfs: add hot tracking support Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:30:58 +0800 Message-Id: <1351485061-12297-17-git-send-email-zwu.kernel@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.6.5 In-Reply-To: <1351485061-12297-1-git-send-email-zwu.kernel@gmail.com> References: <1351485061-12297-1-git-send-email-zwu.kernel@gmail.com> X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 12102904-7282-0000-0000-00000E5C5030 Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org From: Zhi Yong Wu Introduce one new mount option '-o hot_track', and add its parsing support. Its usage looks like: mount -o hot_track mount -o nouser,hot_track mount -o nouser,hot_track,loop mount -o hot_track,nouser Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu Reviewed-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 1 + fs/btrfs/super.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h index c72ead8..4703178 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h @@ -1756,6 +1756,7 @@ struct btrfs_ioctl_defrag_range_args { #define BTRFS_MOUNT_CHECK_INTEGRITY (1 << 20) #define BTRFS_MOUNT_CHECK_INTEGRITY_INCLUDING_EXTENT_DATA (1 << 21) #define BTRFS_MOUNT_PANIC_ON_FATAL_ERROR (1 << 22) +#define BTRFS_MOUNT_HOT_TRACK (1 << 23) #define btrfs_clear_opt(o, opt) ((o) &= ~BTRFS_MOUNT_##opt) #define btrfs_set_opt(o, opt) ((o) |= BTRFS_MOUNT_##opt) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c index 915ac14..0bcc62b 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include "compat.h" #include "delayed-inode.h" #include "ctree.h" @@ -299,6 +300,10 @@ static void btrfs_put_super(struct super_block *sb) * last process that kept it busy. Or segfault in the aforementioned * process... Whom would you report that to? */ + + /* Hot data tracking */ + if (btrfs_test_opt(btrfs_sb(sb)->tree_root, HOT_TRACK)) + hot_track_exit(sb); } enum { @@ -311,7 +316,7 @@ enum { Opt_enospc_debug, Opt_subvolrootid, Opt_defrag, Opt_inode_cache, Opt_no_space_cache, Opt_recovery, Opt_skip_balance, Opt_check_integrity, Opt_check_integrity_including_extent_data, - Opt_check_integrity_print_mask, Opt_fatal_errors, + Opt_check_integrity_print_mask, Opt_fatal_errors, Opt_hot_track, Opt_err, }; @@ -352,6 +357,7 @@ static match_table_t tokens = { {Opt_check_integrity_including_extent_data, "check_int_data"}, {Opt_check_integrity_print_mask, "check_int_print_mask=%d"}, {Opt_fatal_errors, "fatal_errors=%s"}, + {Opt_hot_track, "hot_track"}, {Opt_err, NULL}, }; @@ -614,6 +620,9 @@ int btrfs_parse_options(struct btrfs_root *root, char *options) goto out; } break; + case Opt_hot_track: + btrfs_set_opt(info->mount_opt, HOT_TRACK); + break; case Opt_err: printk(KERN_INFO "btrfs: unrecognized mount option " "'%s'\n", p); @@ -841,11 +850,20 @@ static int btrfs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, goto fail_close; } + if (btrfs_test_opt(fs_info->tree_root, HOT_TRACK)) { + err = hot_track_init(sb); + if (err) + goto fail_hot; + } + save_mount_options(sb, data); cleancache_init_fs(sb); sb->s_flags |= MS_ACTIVE; return 0; +fail_hot: + dput(sb->s_root); + sb->s_root = NULL; fail_close: close_ctree(fs_info->tree_root); return err; @@ -941,6 +959,8 @@ static int btrfs_show_options(struct seq_file *seq, struct dentry *dentry) seq_puts(seq, ",skip_balance"); if (btrfs_test_opt(root, PANIC_ON_FATAL_ERROR)) seq_puts(seq, ",fatal_errors=panic"); + if (btrfs_test_opt(root, HOT_TRACK)) + seq_puts(seq, ",hot_track"); return 0; }