Patchwork [GIT,PULL] ux500 fixes due for v3.7 RCs

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Lee Jones
Date Oct. 25, 2012, 9:41 a.m.
Message ID <20121025094147.GA4008@gmail.com>
Download mbox
Permalink /patch/194088/
State New
Headers show

Pull-request

git://git.linaro.org/people/ljones/linux-3.0-ux500.git for-rcs-3.7

Comments

Lee Jones - Oct. 25, 2012, 9:41 a.m.
The following changes since commit 6f0c0580b70c89094b3422ba81118c7b959c7556:

  Linux 3.7-rc2 (2012-10-20 12:11:32 -0700)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.linaro.org/people/ljones/linux-3.0-ux500.git for-rcs-3.7

for you to fetch changes up to 76ff4e434734f7772d1a592cc9fe1d9921a3ec40:

  ARM: ux500: Correct SDI5 address and add some format changes (2012-10-25 08:46:20 +0100)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Lee Jones (3):
      ARM: ux500: Fix build error relating to IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE
      ARM: ux500: Specify AMBA Primecell IDs for Nomadik I2C in DT
      ARM: ux500: Correct SDI5 address and add some format changes

 arch/arm/boot/dts/dbx5x0.dtsi |   17 ++++++++++++++++-
 arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu.c     |    1 +
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Arnd Bergmann - Oct. 25, 2012, 1:52 p.m.
On Thursday 25 October 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
> The following changes since commit 6f0c0580b70c89094b3422ba81118c7b959c7556:
> 
>   Linux 3.7-rc2 (2012-10-20 12:11:32 -0700)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.linaro.org/people/ljones/linux-3.0-ux500.git for-rcs-3.7

Pulled into fixes branch, thanks!

Since we're now getting pull requests from both of you, Lee and Linus,
I'd like to understand how you are organized.

Lee, are you just sending bug fixes directly and send future work through
Linus, or are you acting as backup maintainer when he is busy otherwise
in general?

	Arnd
Linus Walleij - Oct. 25, 2012, 2:41 p.m.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:

> Since we're now getting pull requests from both of you, Lee and Linus,
> I'd like to understand how you are organized.
>
> Lee, are you just sending bug fixes directly and send future work through
> Linus, or are you acting as backup maintainer when he is busy otherwise
> in general?

Let us say that Lee is pushing stuff that is DT-related, e.g. fixes that
only manifest in DT environments and I'm pushing most other stuff.

I'm happy that Lee is doing some nice offloading as pinctrl and gpio is
currently quite busy.

One day Srinidhi may also send pull requests, as co-maintainer.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
Lee Jones - Oct. 25, 2012, 3:48 p.m.
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> 
> > Since we're now getting pull requests from both of you, Lee and Linus,
> > I'd like to understand how you are organized.
> >
> > Lee, are you just sending bug fixes directly and send future work through
> > Linus, or are you acting as backup maintainer when he is busy otherwise
> > in general?
> 
> Let us say that Lee is pushing stuff that is DT-related, e.g. fixes that
> only manifest in DT environments and I'm pushing most other stuff.
> 
> I'm happy that Lee is doing some nice offloading as pinctrl and gpio is
> currently quite busy.
> 
> One day Srinidhi may also send pull requests, as co-maintainer.

Right. As I was creating quite a lot of traffic, I've basically been
asked to push all my own stuff after I've acquired the right Acks.
I won't be pushing/acking anything else i.e. not acting as a co-
maintainer.

Hope that clears things up.

Kind regards,
Lee
Arnd Bergmann - Oct. 26, 2012, 9:20 a.m.
On Thursday 25 October 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > 
> > > Since we're now getting pull requests from both of you, Lee and Linus,
> > > I'd like to understand how you are organized.
> > >
> > > Lee, are you just sending bug fixes directly and send future work through
> > > Linus, or are you acting as backup maintainer when he is busy otherwise
> > > in general?
> > 
> > Let us say that Lee is pushing stuff that is DT-related, e.g. fixes that
> > only manifest in DT environments and I'm pushing most other stuff.
> > 
> > I'm happy that Lee is doing some nice offloading as pinctrl and gpio is
> > currently quite busy.
> > 
> > One day Srinidhi may also send pull requests, as co-maintainer.
> 
> Right. As I was creating quite a lot of traffic, I've basically been
> asked to push all my own stuff after I've acquired the right Acks.
> I won't be pushing/acking anything else i.e. not acting as a co-
> maintainer.
> 
> Hope that clears things up.

Ok, thanks for the explanations,

	Arnd