| Message ID | 1351107870-5255-1-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | Awaiting Upstream |
| Delegated to: | Stefano Babic |
| Headers | show |
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com> > > Allow booting a zImage kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com> > --- > include/configs/mx53loco.h | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/include/configs/mx53loco.h b/include/configs/mx53loco.h > index 0658dd3..25672c0 100644 > --- a/include/configs/mx53loco.h > +++ b/include/configs/mx53loco.h > @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ > > /* Command definition */ > #include <config_cmd_default.h> > +#define CONFIG_CMD_BOOTZ Fabio, Any thoughts on also enabling "define CONFIG_SUPPORT_RAW_INITRD" at the same time, otherwise you'd still have to run mkimage on the other half "initrd.img-$(uname -r)" when using booting an initramfs with your main kernel image.. Regards,
Hi Robert, On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@gmail.com> wrote: > Fabio, > > Any thoughts on also enabling "define CONFIG_SUPPORT_RAW_INITRD" at > the same time, otherwise you'd still have to run mkimage on the other > half "initrd.img-$(uname -r)" when using booting an initramfs with > your main kernel image.. Sure, no problem. We can enable CONFIG_SUPPORT_RAW_INITRD as well. Stefano, Should I enable CONFIG_SUPPORT_RAW_INITRD as part of the same patch series or on a separate one? Thanks, Fabio Estevam
Am 25/10/2012 04:15, schrieb Fabio Estevam: > Hi Robert, > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Fabio, >> >> Any thoughts on also enabling "define CONFIG_SUPPORT_RAW_INITRD" at >> the same time, otherwise you'd still have to run mkimage on the other >> half "initrd.img-$(uname -r)" when using booting an initramfs with >> your main kernel image.. > > Sure, no problem. We can enable CONFIG_SUPPORT_RAW_INITRD as well. > > Stefano, > > Should I enable CONFIG_SUPPORT_RAW_INITRD as part of the same patch > series or on a separate one? Your decision, both are fine with me. Regards, Stefano Babic
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de> wrote: >> Should I enable CONFIG_SUPPORT_RAW_INITRD as part of the same patch >> series or on a separate one? > > Your decision, both are fine with me. Ok, then I prefer to keep this series as is. I will send a separate one for adding CONFIG_SUPPORT_RAW_INITRD only for mx53loco as requested by Robert. Regards, Fabio Estevam
Am 25/10/2012 13:16, schrieb Fabio Estevam: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de> wrote: > >>> Should I enable CONFIG_SUPPORT_RAW_INITRD as part of the same patch >>> series or on a separate one? >> >> Your decision, both are fine with me. > > Ok, then I prefer to keep this series as is. > > I will send a separate one for adding CONFIG_SUPPORT_RAW_INITRD only > for mx53loco as requested by Robert. Ok, fine. This series is then ready to be merged. Regards, Stefano Babic
On 24/10/2012 21:44, Fabio Estevam wrote: > From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com> > > Allow booting a zImage kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com> > --- > include/configs/mx53loco.h | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/include/configs/mx53loco.h b/include/configs/mx53loco.h > index 0658dd3..25672c0 100644 > --- a/include/configs/mx53loco.h > +++ b/include/configs/mx53loco.h > @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ > > /* Command definition */ > #include <config_cmd_default.h> > +#define CONFIG_CMD_BOOTZ > > #undef CONFIG_CMD_IMLS > > Applied to u-boot-imx, thanks. Best regards, Stefano Babic
diff --git a/include/configs/mx53loco.h b/include/configs/mx53loco.h index 0658dd3..25672c0 100644 --- a/include/configs/mx53loco.h +++ b/include/configs/mx53loco.h @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ /* Command definition */ #include <config_cmd_default.h> +#define CONFIG_CMD_BOOTZ #undef CONFIG_CMD_IMLS