From patchwork Sun Oct 21 14:08:36 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Gerald Pfeifer X-Patchwork-Id: 192997 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F2FEE2C007C for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 01:08:49 +1100 (EST) Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1351433331; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received:Date: From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; bh=x/dBJuHny+20oHctiZ1T CVo4fp8=; b=Eq7DeHNeBrqaAx17A6eNE38E9h6jTN+mI+7Zp1Dk83+WKBj9KPUo cCwzn9toICn6g5F8nxViXVV2yxUKXUT9NSXTT/9hDJJZC1oxdkGmSYp9Mzi6YHG/ u6kzoAx3knw2fqfOxVXSQ1ZF7rTwZ0sKt0BRk54ITRxkQvl8RTWzfMQ= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-IsSubscribed:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; b=GBrRnuhj/sY7Do69gzMu+2kUsxGx3KQI9hPCI1tG3y9+MjTknPEP9G8PABFRqj dWvrkDJbFHcM+HRuE05t/NP2WJ4KqRJVAPKSsPElpub8rHgsg8O43Q19mwsXBC28 FIIyD62wOWtrPbSSpWFqy1GkHEgIloqjEshYsrJ54suF4=; Received: (qmail 31064 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2012 14:08:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 31043 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Oct 2012 14:08:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-50.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,TW_GC X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ainaz.pair.com (HELO ainaz.pair.com) (209.68.2.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 14:08:36 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.129] (vie-188-118-240-184.dsl.sil.at [188.118.240.184]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E834F3F40F; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 10:08:34 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 16:08:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, java-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [wwwdocs, Java] Remove obsolete FAQ entry re old GNU/Linux versions Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org While looking for something else I found this (and in general it looks like the GCJ FAQ could use some spring cleaning). Lots of "might be possible" in addition to this being really about quite older versions of GNU/Linux. Applied. Gerald 2012-10-21 Gerald Pfeifer * faq.html (My libgcj build fails with "invalid use of undefined type struct sigcontext_struct"): Remove. Index: faq.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/java/faq.html,v retrieving revision 1.65 diff -u -3 -p -r1.65 faq.html --- faq.html 16 May 2011 04:57:30 -0000 1.65 +++ faq.html 21 Oct 2012 14:05:19 -0000 @@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ should I build it?
  • Linker bug on Solaris
  • Can I configure/build in the source tree?
    • -
  • My libgcj build fails with "invalid use of undefined type struct sigcontext_struct"
  • Gcj Compile/Link Questions @@ -330,22 +329,6 @@ $ ../configure [...] -
    -

    3.4 My libgcj build fails with "invalid use of undefined type struct sigcontext_struct"

    -
    -
    -

    If you're using Linux, this probably means you need to upgrade to - a newwer, glibc (libc6) based Linux distribution. libgcj does not - support the older linux libc5.

    -

    It might be possible to get a working libgcj by changing occurrences - of "sigcontext_struct" to "sigcontext", however this has not been tested. - Even if it works, it is likely that there are other issues with older - libc versions that would prevent libgcj from working correctly (threads - bugs, for example).

    -
    -
    - -

    Gcj Compile/Link Questions

    4.1 Why do I get undefined reference to `main'