From patchwork Sun Oct 21 06:09:47 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Chung-Lin Tang X-Patchwork-Id: 192984 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A2E22C0089 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 17:10:05 +1100 (EST) Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1351404606; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received:Received: Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC: Subject:Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender: Delivered-To; bh=yBPrM5ANzikkm1I2jFTB82rqjJQ=; b=cvRKhZ96bPajLL0 oA3E1wskdFodVONcoJwxATd2qSHo8DkWguqoSCJICrdWnng+C5MeWbfq6QgRuI7Z vREx5A+cMofsyITtmjfJa/wK1tZegSgzTYaw+W+JXh8iKalt3FgpdRAyLE63SqCx ali2UXk7DHl6AkTMhpQd15rlWTLA= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:Received:Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:Content-Type:X-IsSubscribed:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; b=vKJiC4Wl3ef/rqUmLQrBQN+QnV5e2Qnub8blCN8P+bq42HpRF6SlUXL34DcEdI 1RG/bMdY/Q0jcJ1EywdijnKyje0/Mj669mw7mbVPPub6FvStXEgV5WxN2DLAbAp7 vgsPBvPtc2+EZq4xoQpxio0xasBjw97djWqihd/r8fVJg=; Received: (qmail 20886 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2012 06:09:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 20874 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Oct 2012 06:09:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, FROM_12LTRDOM, KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST, RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W, RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL, TW_FN X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 06:09:52 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1TPojO-0000FC-Pn from ChungLin_Tang@mentor.com ; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:09:50 -0700 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-04.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.41]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:09:50 -0700 Received: from air.local (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-04.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:09:49 -0700 Message-ID: <508391AB.6050300@codesourcery.com> Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 14:09:47 +0800 From: Chung-Lin Tang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gcc-patches CC: Sterling Augustine , Jan-Benedict Glaw Subject: [PATCH][xtensa] Remove unused variable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Hi Sterling, the last thread pointer builtin changes left an unused 'arg' variable in xtensa_expand_builtin(), which triggered a new warning. Thanks to Jan-Benedict for testing this. Attached patch was committed as obvious. Thanks, Chung-Lin * config/xtensa/xtensa.c (xtensa_expand_builtin): Remove unused 'arg' variable. Index: config/xtensa/xtensa.c =================================================================== --- config/xtensa/xtensa.c (revision 192647) +++ config/xtensa/xtensa.c (working copy) @@ -3133,7 +3133,6 @@ xtensa_expand_builtin (tree exp, rtx target, { tree fndecl = TREE_OPERAND (CALL_EXPR_FN (exp), 0); unsigned int fcode = DECL_FUNCTION_CODE (fndecl); - rtx arg; switch (fcode) {