mbox

[00/30] Migration thread 20121017 edition

Message ID 1350545426-23172-1-git-send-email-quintela@redhat.com
State New
Headers show

Pull-request

http://repo.or.cz/r/qemu/quintela.git migration-thread-20121017

Message

Juan Quintela Oct. 18, 2012, 7:29 a.m. UTC
Hi

This series apply on top of the refactoring that I sent yesterday.
Changes from the last version include:

- buffered_file.c is gone, its functionality is merged in migration.c
  special attention to the megre of buffered_file_thread() &
  migration_file_put_notify().

- Some more bitmap handling optimizations (thanks to Orit & Paolo for
  suggestions and code and Vinod for testing)

Please review.  Included is the pointer to the full tree.

Thanks, Juan.

The following changes since commit b6348f29d033d5a8a26f633d2ee94362595f32a4:

  target-arm/translate: Fix RRX operands (2012-10-17 19:56:46 +0200)

are available in the git repository at:

  http://repo.or.cz/r/qemu/quintela.git migration-thread-20121017

for you to fetch changes up to 486dabc29f56d8f0e692395d4a6cd483b3a77f01:

  ram: optimize migration bitmap walking (2012-10-18 09:20:34 +0200)


v3:

This is work in progress on top of the previous migration series just sent.

- Introduces a thread for migration instead of using a timer and callback
- remove the writting to the fd from the iothread lock
- make the writes synchronous
- Introduce a new pending method that returns how many bytes are pending for
  one save live section
- last patch just shows printfs to see where the time is being spent
  on the migration complete phase.
  (yes it pollutes all uses of stop on the monitor)

So far I have found that we spent a lot of time on bdrv_flush_all() It
can take from 1ms to 600ms (yes, it is not a typo).  That dwarfs the
migration default downtime time (30ms).

Stop all vcpus:

- it works now (after the changes on qemu_cpu_is_vcpu on the previous
  series) caveat is that the time that brdv_flush_all() takes is
  "unpredictable".  Any silver bullets?

  Paolo suggested to call for migration completion phase:

  bdrv_aio_flush_all();
  Sent the dirty pages;
  bdrv_drain_all()
  brdv_flush_all()
  another round through the bitmap in case that completions have
  changed some page

  Paolo, did I get it right?
  Any other suggestion?

- migrate_cancel() is not properly implemented (as in the film that we
  take no locks, ...)

- expected_downtime is not calculated.

  I am about to merge migrate_fd_put_ready & buffered_thread() and
  that would make trivial to calculate.

It outputs something like:

wakeup_request 0
time cpu_disable_ticks 0
time pause_all_vcpus 1
time runstate_set 1
time vmstate_notify 2
time bdrv_drain_all 2
time flush device /dev/disk/by-path/ip-192.168.10.200:3260-iscsi-iqn.2010-12.org.trasno:iscsi.lvm-lun-1: 3
time flush device : 3
time flush device : 3
time flush device : 3
time bdrv_flush_all 5
time monitor_protocol_event 5
vm_stop 2 5
synchronize_all_states 1
migrate RAM 37
migrate rest devices 1
complete without error 3a 44
completed 45
end completed stage 45

As you can see, we estimate that we can sent all pending data in 30ms,
it took 37ms to send the RAM (that is what we calculate).  So
estimation is quite good.

What it gives me lots of variation is on the line with device name of "time flush device".
That is what varies between 1ms to 600ms

This is in a completely idle guest.  I am running:

	while (1) {
		uint64_t delay;

		if (gettimeofday(&t0, NULL) != 0)
			perror("gettimeofday 1");
		if (usleep(ms2us(10)) != 0)
			perror("usleep");
		if (gettimeofday(&t1, NULL) != 0)
			perror("gettimeofday 2");

		t1.tv_usec -= t0.tv_usec;
		if (t1.tv_usec < 0) {
			t1.tv_usec += 1000000;
			t1.tv_sec--;
		}
		t1.tv_sec -= t0.tv_sec;

		delay = t1.tv_sec * 1000 + t1.tv_usec/1000;

		if (delay > 100)
			printf("delay of %ld ms\n", delay);
       }

To see the latency inside the guest (i.e. ask for a 10ms sleep, and see how long it takes).


[root@d1 ~]# ./timer 
delay of 161 ms
delay of 135 ms
delay of 143 ms
delay of 132 ms
delay of 131 ms
delay of 141 ms
delay of 113 ms
delay of 119 ms
delay of 114 ms


But that values are independent of migration.  Without even starting
the migration, idle guest doing nothing, we get it sometimes.



Juan Quintela (27):
  buffered_file: Move from using a timer to use a thread
  migration: make qemu_fopen_ops_buffered() return void
  migration: stop all cpus correctly
  migration: make writes blocking
  migration: remove unfreeze logic
  migration: take finer locking
  buffered_file: Unfold the trick to restart generating migration data
  buffered_file: don't flush on put buffer
  buffered_file: unfold buffered_append in buffered_put_buffer
  savevm: New save live migration method: pending
  migration: include qemu-file.h
  migration-fd: remove duplicate include
  migration: move buffered_file.c code into migration.c
  migration: move migration_fd_put_ready()
  migration: Inline qemu_fopen_ops_buffered into migrate_fd_connect
  migration: move migration notifier
  migration: move begining stage to the migration thread
  migration: move exit condition to migration thread
  migration: unfold rest of migrate_fd_put_ready() into thread
  migration: print times for end phase
  ram: rename last_block to last_seen_block
  ram: Add last_sent_block
  memory: introduce memory_region_test_and_clear_dirty
  ram: Use memory_region_test_and_clear_dirty
  fix memory.c
  migration: Only go to the iterate stage if there is anything to send
  ram: optimize migration bitmap walking

Paolo Bonzini (1):
  split MRU ram list

Umesh Deshpande (2):
  add a version number to ram_list
  protect the ramlist with a separate mutex

 Makefile.objs     |   2 +-
 arch_init.c       | 133 +++++++++++--------
 block-migration.c |  49 ++-----
 block.c           |   6 +
 buffered_file.c   | 256 -----------------------------------
 buffered_file.h   |  22 ---
 cpu-all.h         |  13 +-
 cpus.c            |  17 +++
 exec.c            |  44 +++++-
 memory.c          |  17 +++
 memory.h          |  18 +++
 migration-exec.c  |   4 +-
 migration-fd.c    |   9 +-
 migration-tcp.c   |  21 +--
 migration-unix.c  |   4 +-
 migration.c       | 391 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 migration.h       |   4 +-
 qemu-file.h       |   5 -
 savevm.c          |  37 +++++-
 sysemu.h          |   1 +
 vmstate.h         |   1 +
 21 files changed, 522 insertions(+), 532 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 buffered_file.c
 delete mode 100644 buffered_file.h

Comments

Paolo Bonzini Oct. 18, 2012, 9 a.m. UTC | #1
Il 18/10/2012 09:29, Juan Quintela ha scritto:
> v3:
> 
> This is work in progress on top of the previous migration series just sent.
> 
> - Introduces a thread for migration instead of using a timer and callback
> - remove the writting to the fd from the iothread lock
> - make the writes synchronous
> - Introduce a new pending method that returns how many bytes are pending for
>   one save live section
> - last patch just shows printfs to see where the time is being spent
>   on the migration complete phase.
>   (yes it pollutes all uses of stop on the monitor)
> 
> So far I have found that we spent a lot of time on bdrv_flush_all() It
> can take from 1ms to 600ms (yes, it is not a typo).  That dwarfs the
> migration default downtime time (30ms).
> 
> Stop all vcpus:
> 
> - it works now (after the changes on qemu_cpu_is_vcpu on the previous
>   series) caveat is that the time that brdv_flush_all() takes is
>   "unpredictable".  Any silver bullets?

You could reuse the "block" live migration item.  In block_save_pending,
start a bdrv_aio_flush() on all block devices that have already
completed the previous one.

But that's not a regression in the migration thread, isn't it?

Paolo
Paolo Bonzini Oct. 26, 2012, 1:04 p.m. UTC | #2
Il 18/10/2012 09:29, Juan Quintela ha scritto:
> Hi
> 
> This series apply on top of the refactoring that I sent yesterday.
> Changes from the last version include:
> 
> - buffered_file.c is gone, its functionality is merged in migration.c
>   special attention to the megre of buffered_file_thread() &
>   migration_file_put_notify().
> 
> - Some more bitmap handling optimizations (thanks to Orit & Paolo for
>   suggestions and code and Vinod for testing)
> 
> Please review.  Included is the pointer to the full tree.

Anthony, I think patches 1-13 are ready to go (but only if Juan reviews
my incoming-migration-in-a-coroutine first ;)).

Paolo