From patchwork Tue Oct 9 22:53:30 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Segher Boessenkool X-Patchwork-Id: 190508 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C2FE2C0040 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:55:43 +1100 (EST) Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1350428144; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received:Received: From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:Mailing-List:Precedence: List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender: Delivered-To; bh=sQnYoTNIv1wRCMf+Y7YxiapIO4M=; b=RzCkgnUgK2QqSwG up2F2h29n8gWvEPiC0I6IczAPAB2MZKZ4hC0VNQm2WWxRlRUfnWe+u8qbhR/Y5lZ ilJxzfC4qBaFutsnShhWBhUHJOoiXGB4MPvqJ+DoEymBM2hCQlbYP/ZOZVhF/9Wn K97fGPjaraYjCx+LQnIMnMt+hjoc= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:X-IsSubscribed:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; b=hxMdD9YicI645UEfY14G67qD4TUay7Ehj1DFCBqCrwcfrhofkk2Abf4UvOv5/d n0y7XO3SIOboE1D5rt564skYY/0ReDyakQMeS1cqwEUBmJCi+kos8ZY0/hJU0zmK p56acH6/7ajbkr7JaobrCS+TLg/qR/saW1lheTfx53Wqs=; Received: (qmail 25852 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2012 22:55:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 25844 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Oct 2012 22:55:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, SARE_MSGID_LONG40 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from gcc1-power7.osuosl.org (HELO gcc1-power7.osuosl.org) (140.211.15.137) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 22:55:03 +0000 Received: from gcc1-power7.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gcc1-power7.osuosl.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q99Mrfvt023654; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 15:53:41 -0700 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gcc1-power7.osuosl.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q99MrbRQ023121; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 15:53:37 -0700 From: Segher Boessenkool To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: dje.gcc@gmail.com, Segher Boessenkool Subject: [PATCH] rs6000: Don't allow %. in PRINT_OPERAND_PUNCT_VALID_P Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 15:53:30 -0700 Message-Id: <191fcc086904ed9d2effdf5eb749fede75345a90.1349822959.git.segher@kernel.crashing.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org As David noticed, I forgot PRINT_OPERAND_PUNCT_VALID_P in the patch that removed %. This fixes it. Bootstrapped and regression tested on powerpc64-linux. Okay to apply? Segher 2012-10-09 Segher Boessenkool gcc/ * config/rs6000/rs6000.h (PRINT_OPERAND_PUNCT_VALID_P): Delete '.'. --- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h | 3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h index b968802..82388d9 100644 --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h @@ -2229,8 +2229,7 @@ extern char rs6000_reg_names[][8]; /* register names (0 vs. %r0). */ /* Define which CODE values are valid. */ -#define PRINT_OPERAND_PUNCT_VALID_P(CODE) \ - ((CODE) == '.' || (CODE) == '&') +#define PRINT_OPERAND_PUNCT_VALID_P(CODE) ((CODE) == '&') /* Print a memory address as an operand to reference that memory location. */