Patchwork [22/34] pseries: Fix semantics of RTAS int-on, int-off and set-xive functions

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Alexander Graf
Date Oct. 4, 2012, 1:56 p.m.
Message ID <1349359016-13107-23-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de>
Download mbox | patch
Permalink /patch/189181/
State New
Headers show

Comments

Alexander Graf - Oct. 4, 2012, 1:56 p.m.
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

Currently the ibm,int-on and ibm,int-off RTAS functions are implemented as
no-ops.  This is because when implemented as specified in PAPR they caused
Linux (which calls both int-on/off and set-xive) to end up with interrupts
masked when they should not be.  Since Linux's set-xive calls make the
int-on/off calls redundant, making them nops worked around the problem.

In fact, the problem was caused because there was a subtle bug in set-xive,
PAPR specifies that as well as updating the current priority, it also needs
to update the saved priority used by int-on/off.  With this bug fixed the
problem goes away.  This patch implements this more correct fix.

Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
---
 hw/xics.c |   25 ++++++++-----------------
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

Patch

diff --git a/hw/xics.c b/hw/xics.c
index 75c8cca..ce88aa7 100644
--- a/hw/xics.c
+++ b/hw/xics.c
@@ -270,13 +270,14 @@  static void write_xive_lsi(struct ics_state *ics, int srcno)
 }
 
 static void ics_write_xive(struct ics_state *ics, int nr, int server,
-                           uint8_t priority)
+                           uint8_t priority, uint8_t saved_priority)
 {
     int srcno = nr - ics->offset;
     struct ics_irq_state *irq = ics->irqs + srcno;
 
     irq->server = server;
     irq->priority = priority;
+    irq->saved_priority = saved_priority;
 
     if (irq->lsi) {
         write_xive_lsi(ics, srcno);
@@ -405,7 +406,7 @@  static void rtas_set_xive(sPAPREnvironment *spapr, uint32_t token,
         return;
     }
 
-    ics_write_xive(ics, nr, server, priority);
+    ics_write_xive(ics, nr, server, priority, priority);
 
     rtas_st(rets, 0, 0); /* Success */
 }
@@ -453,14 +454,8 @@  static void rtas_int_off(sPAPREnvironment *spapr, uint32_t token,
         return;
     }
 
-    /* This is a NOP for now, since the described PAPR semantics don't
-     * seem to gel with what Linux does */
-#if 0
-    struct ics_irq_state *irq = xics->irqs + (nr - xics->offset);
-
-    irq->saved_priority = irq->priority;
-    ics_write_xive_msi(xics, nr, irq->server, 0xff);
-#endif
+    ics_write_xive(ics, nr, ics->irqs[nr - ics->offset].server, 0xff,
+                   ics->irqs[nr - ics->offset].priority);
 
     rtas_st(rets, 0, 0); /* Success */
 }
@@ -484,13 +479,9 @@  static void rtas_int_on(sPAPREnvironment *spapr, uint32_t token,
         return;
     }
 
-    /* This is a NOP for now, since the described PAPR semantics don't
-     * seem to gel with what Linux does */
-#if 0
-    struct ics_irq_state *irq = xics->irqs + (nr - xics->offset);
-
-    ics_write_xive_msi(xics, nr, irq->server, irq->saved_priority);
-#endif
+    ics_write_xive(ics, nr, ics->irqs[nr - ics->offset].server,
+                   ics->irqs[nr - ics->offset].saved_priority,
+                   ics->irqs[nr - ics->offset].saved_priority);
 
     rtas_st(rets, 0, 0); /* Success */
 }