From patchwork Sun Sep 30 19:03:22 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Dehao Chen X-Patchwork-Id: 188190 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 182512C00DA for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 05:03:32 +1000 (EST) Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1349636613; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received: MIME-Version:Received:Received:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To: Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; bh=WcJMMZk MlVY2M1OmtLBQgsyfF8Y=; b=FYhcHvd3WpuY8CE7oTms/8wXVTbpGg8Uqc4f7sQ 6ODE3NFLFmrwzlmpnBKFgkHp1wyWZQcwEv8tlcS2SmfaPCScODGg4a/9Z+SgbZ+h o1fVSwH+8ChTfJ4Qj290S+sXwh1bNnF3IIpk68pC1kT6ydwkE0e8/c0wmJ/XwXpW Yp7c= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:Received:X-Google-DKIM-Signature:MIME-Version:Received:Received:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Content-Type:X-System-Of-Record:X-Gm-Message-State:X-IsSubscribed:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; b=VBcZVX96+0N9GrZhGEn75ZgOCmowcAmxP8gvtli574bW3GNjiSvEl/jeLMIz07 6NKgOZPniESB1gvj5vUjz/y/2AoDB/1kcLNIqycCew2rRDaG7q5XNy28jRgV3cSB yUsBzZFgWWzLiC6HyPcZRhjF5CySV9WU0MvdywGPNkkx8=; Received: (qmail 31817 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2012 19:03:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 31808 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Sep 2012 19:03:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, KHOP_RCVD_TRUST, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE, RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-pa0-f47.google.com) (209.85.220.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 19:03:23 +0000 Received: by padfa11 with SMTP id fa11so3712814pad.20 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 12:03:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state; bh=K9mdaHiqFg68eEbyBtROAo4MVtcguU3Rx3AsJGSq7ww=; b=Wi8MKeIPr+zwMP+o3DVMS9PUiyw8rYgrNNy9o6triQuw6aS1ajMpDD8pdk2NHyu86D cPrXzWn8qHLGUFCXqqHnlgsdtf0XGn9spWuqpZiaOtJE7yQX06Pgfi1YIFMZhtge0Fl+ uELPBeWowo8UPPwUxyXzGqdRUvafKhMTxu1InTMYUtXhPTEn5oeShRK9RJcBgt2Der1+ s4BbkdM+61uldVqOu73MbBsgPvO72F76viubMZUA6P6oh/FPLqKsfWAbQgDvLrfmiuKh 8nlbpHAF+0IljvmRHj9tGwhoRFuzCn4hi58gNP03d8vfc0Kn/zxCh/KTM+XYJLt9qD8O 1WnQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.189.164 with SMTP id gj4mr35647645pbc.48.1349031802678; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 12:03:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.49.232 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 12:03:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 12:03:22 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: [PATCH] Fix PR middle-end/54759 From: Dehao Chen To: GCC Patches X-System-Of-Record: true X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlyaNs9MkAO+p5PpM5GzuzIVwVMs8xZt90+FO4ivLDJ9FV8/fFzoTdQ8qgySFdUO8BEYqfkEDl55Rz6ju9V5gncZH8nB3M34rwhArVm5NChfeYCAYaG6UxlSgJmGSuX7CkPx1HXaZIqcv4IyWUbzU7KfjKJSEbSjOM27iadr7DbktsCxubrXwG7ubPskR/06CMfJcA+ X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Hi, This patch fixes the bug when comparing location to UNKNOWN_LOC. Bootstrapped and passed gcc regression test. Okay for trunk? Thanks, Dehao 2012-09-30 Dehao Chen PR middle-end/54759 * gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.c (slpeel_make_loop_iterate_ntimes): Use LOCATION_LOCUS to compare with UNKNOWN_LOCATION. (slpeel_tree_peel_loop_to_edge): Likewise. * gcc/tree-vectorizer.c (vectorize_loops): Likewise. Index: gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.c =================================================================== --- gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.c (revision 191876) +++ gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.c (working copy) @@ -793,7 +793,7 @@ slpeel_make_loop_iterate_ntimes (struct loop *loop loop_loc = find_loop_location (loop); if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS)) { - if (loop_loc != UNKNOWN_LOC) + if (LOCATION_LOCUS (loop_loc) != UNKNOWN_LOC) fprintf (dump_file, "\nloop at %s:%d: ", LOC_FILE (loop_loc), LOC_LINE (loop_loc)); print_gimple_stmt (dump_file, cond_stmt, 0, TDF_SLIM); @@ -1248,7 +1248,7 @@ slpeel_tree_peel_loop_to_edge (struct loop *loop, loop_loc = find_loop_location (loop); if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS)) { - if (loop_loc != UNKNOWN_LOC) + if (LOCATION_LOCUS (loop_loc) != UNKNOWN_LOC) fprintf (dump_file, "\n%s:%d: note: ", LOC_FILE (loop_loc), LOC_LINE (loop_loc)); fprintf (dump_file, "tree_duplicate_loop_to_edge_cfg failed.\n"); Index: gcc/tree-vectorizer.c =================================================================== --- gcc/tree-vectorizer.c (revision 191876) +++ gcc/tree-vectorizer.c (working copy) @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ vectorize_loops (void) loop_vec_info loop_vinfo; vect_location = find_loop_location (loop); - if (vect_location != UNKNOWN_LOC + if (LOCATION_LOCUS (vect_location) != UNKNOWN_LOC && vect_verbosity_level > REPORT_NONE) fprintf (vect_dump, "\nAnalyzing loop at %s:%d\n", LOC_FILE (vect_location), LOC_LINE (vect_location)); @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ vectorize_loops (void) if (!loop_vinfo || !LOOP_VINFO_VECTORIZABLE_P (loop_vinfo)) continue; - if (vect_location != UNKNOWN_LOC + if (LOCATION_LOCUS (vect_location) != UNKNOWN_LOC && vect_verbosity_level > REPORT_NONE) fprintf (vect_dump, "\n\nVectorizing loop at %s:%d\n", LOC_FILE (vect_location), LOC_LINE (vect_location));