diff mbox

RFC: LRA for x86/x86-64 [0/9]

Message ID CABu31nM_KaOMLo_rU+WBxO-BCXk9dErtJ3LXfiXGZup4aDM+yw@mail.gmail.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Steven Bosscher Sept. 28, 2012, 7:23 p.m. UTC 
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 12-09-28 4:21 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>    Any comments and proposals are appreciated.  Even if GCC community
>>> decides that it is too late to submit it to gcc4.8, the earlier reviews
>>> are always useful.
>>
>> I would like to see some benchmark numbers, both for code quality and
>> compile time impact for the most notorious compile time hog PRs for
>> large routines where IRA performs poorly (e.g. PR54146, PR26854).
>>
>>
> I should look at this, Steven. Unfortunately, the compiler @ trunk (without
> my patch) crashes on PR54156:
>
> ../../../trunk2/slow.cc: In function ‘void check_() [with NT = CGAL::Gmpfi;
> int s = 3]’:
> ../../../trunk2/slow.cc:95489:6: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
> void check_(){
> ^
> 0x888adf crash_signal
> /home/vmakarov/build1/trunk/gcc/gcc/toplev.c:335
> 0x8f4718 gimple_code
> /home/vmakarov/build1/trunk/gcc/gcc/gimple.h:1126
> 0x8f4718 gimple_nop_p
> /home/vmakarov/build1/trunk/gcc/gcc/gimple.h:4851
> 0x8f4718 walk_aliased_vdefs_1
> /home/vmakarov/build1/trunk/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-alias.c:2204
> 0x8f50ed walk_aliased_vdefs(ao_ref_s*, tree_node*, bool (*)(ao_ref_s*,
> tree_node*, void*), void*, bitmap_head_def**)
> /home/vmakarov/build1/trunk/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-alias.c:2240
> 0x9018b5 propagate_necessity
> /home/vmakarov/build1/trunk/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-dce.c:909
> 0x9027b3 perform_tree_ssa_dce
> /home/vmakarov/build1/trunk/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-dce.c:1584
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
> See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.

Works for me on gcc17 at r191835, with a gcc configured like so:

"../trunk/configure --with-mpfr=/opt/cfarm/mpfr-latest
--with-gmp=/opt/cfarm/gmp-latest --with-mpc=/opt/cfarm/mpc-latest
--with-isl=/opt/cfarm/isl-latest --with-cloog=/opt/cfarm/cloog-latest
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release
--with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld
--with-as=/opt/cfarm/binutils-latest/bin/as
--with-ld=/opt/cfarm/binutils-latest/bin/ld"

Top 10 time consumers:
integrated_RA   191.66
df_live&initialized_regs        73.43
df_live_regs    72.25
out_of_ssa      45.21
tree_PTA        35.44
tree_SSA_incremental    26.53
remove_unused_locals    18.78
combiner        16.54
dominance_computation   14.44
register_information    14.20
 TOTAL                 : 732.10

Note I'm using the simplified test case, see comment #14 in the PR.
You can just take the original test case
(http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27912) and apply this
patch:


You can compile the test case with:
"./xgcc -B. -S -std=gnu++11 -O1 -frounding-math -ftime-report slow.cc"

Even with this path, the test case really is a great scalability
challange for the compiler :-) I never got the full test case to work
at -O1, and the simpler test case still blows up the compiler at -O2
and higher. At -O1 you need a machine with at least 8GB of memory.
More than half of that is for IRA+reload...

Ciao!
Steven
diff mbox

Patch

--- slow.cc.orig        2012-09-28 21:07:58.000000000 +0200
+++ slow.cc     2012-09-28 21:08:38.000000000 +0200
@@ -95503,6 +95503,7 @@ 
   check_<NT,Eigen::Dynamic>();
 }
 int main(){
+#if 0
   {
     typedef CGAL::Interval_nt<true> I1;
     I1::Protector p1;
@@ -95517,11 +95518,14 @@ 
   check<CGAL::Gmpz>();
   check<CGAL::Gmpq>();
   check<CGAL::Gmpfr>();
+#endif
   check<CGAL::Gmpfi>();
+#if 0
   check<CGAL::Quotient<CGAL::Gmpz> >();
   check<CGAL::Lazy_exact_nt<CGAL::Gmpq> >();
   check<CORE::BigInt>();
   check<CORE::BigRat>();
   check<CORE::BigFloat>();
   check<CORE::Expr>();
+#endif
 }