From patchwork Wed Sep 12 14:37:54 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [MTD-UTILS] io_update test: correct lseek parameters order From: Richard Genoud X-Patchwork-Id: 183389 Message-Id: <1347460674-3536-1-git-send-email-richard.genoud@gmail.com> To: David Woodhouse , Artem Bityutskiy Cc: Richard Genoud , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:37:54 +0200 There's a typo in lseek parameters order. But, due to the value of SEEK_SET, this commit doesn't introduce a change. Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud --- tests/ubi-tests/io_update.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/ubi-tests/io_update.c b/tests/ubi-tests/io_update.c index 0259446..e8f0986 100644 --- a/tests/ubi-tests/io_update.c +++ b/tests/ubi-tests/io_update.c @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static int test_update1(struct ubi_vol_info *vol_info, int leb_change) } /* Check data */ - if ((ret = lseek(fd, SEEK_SET, 0)) != 0) { + if ((ret = lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_SET)) != 0) { failed("lseek"); errmsg("cannot seek to 0"); goto close;