From patchwork Tue Sep 11 13:49:23 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ramana Radhakrishnan X-Patchwork-Id: 183115 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 526892C0089 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 23:49:48 +1000 (EST) Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1347976189; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received:Received: Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence: List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender: Delivered-To; bh=yrRKTEVwJldmSwkk7cx9MHcdebM=; b=NQrTaXxpTYvS7jQ qiZN3954eDBESpqG4t83QhAyRNBYWUVJfuCbq+CWk83GPAnQVdDrsHz4eQK1MCOG l3hM2VXt7aMa7S29e9w3UtpO4/5C3RA4YNcNBnCksSGpRnxtplT+nBRfJ85nPXP4 pRfMu4/W2x3E8s9zY6hz+rBMrhQY= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-MC-Unique:Content-Type:X-IsSubscribed:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; b=kX0xThPUOmKo6xkFjS72QBNZ0GwP1i6qSxQ6uq8TFuZ2Y3UKKA+l6YVwca2MW7 RQuIm3Rfg/Q6ahVz6ZODc7qwuKfVp0mAkEEvQ4EytxthM5RtIKlxWBcmDD/j2GLN 4Ero7hUILiAIL6vaL4/U6xTzPa2+HWb8/GkKhSEOGY4yI=; Received: (qmail 22950 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2012 13:49:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 22938 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Sep 2012 13:49:41 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST, KHOP_THREADED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, TW_FP, TW_VF X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from service87.mimecast.com (HELO service87.mimecast.com) (91.220.42.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:49:27 +0000 Received: from cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.21]) by service87.mimecast.com; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:49:25 +0100 Received: from [10.1.69.70] ([10.1.255.212]) by cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:49:23 +0100 Message-ID: <504F4163.3020209@arm.com> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:49:23 +0100 From: Ramana Radhakrishnan Reply-To: ramrad01@arm.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: [Patch ARM] Allow auto-vectorizer to use vfma. References: <504F3481.8060101@arm.com> <504F37B5.6060609@net-b.de> <504F39FC.90003@net-b.de> In-Reply-To: <504F39FC.90003@net-b.de> X-MC-Unique: 112091114492513701 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org On 09/11/12 14:17, Tobias Burnus wrote: > On 09/11/2012 03:08 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote: >> your patch broke bootstrapping here: >> /home/tob/projects/gcc-git/gcc/gcc/doc//sourcebuild.texi:1537: Node >> `arm_neon_ok' previously defined at line 1532. > > I fixed it (Rev. 191181) with the attached patch. arm_neon_ok should > have been arm_neon2_ok. (I also changed spaces into tabs in the ChangeLog.) On 09/11/12 14:17, Tobias Burnus wrote: > On 09/11/2012 03:08 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote: >> your patch broke bootstrapping here: >> /home/tob/projects/gcc-git/gcc/gcc/doc//sourcebuild.texi:1537: Node >> `arm_neon_ok' previously defined at line 1532. > > I fixed it (Rev. 191181) with the attached patch. arm_neon_ok should > have been arm_neon2_ok. (I also changed spaces into tabs in the ChangeLog.) Nearly: should be arm_neonv2_ok rather than arm_neon_ok. I've realized another issue with the command line and committed this as obvious after checking that the documentation built fine. Thanks and apologies for the slip-up. I've changed machines recently and somethings not ok in this new setup. regards, Ramana 2012-09-11 Ramana Radhakrishnan * doc/sourcebuild.texi (arm_neon_v2_ok): Adjust command line. Index: gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi =================================================================== --- gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi (revision 191181) +++ gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi (revision 191182) @@ -1534,8 +1534,8 @@ ARM Target supports @code{-mfpu=neon -mf options. Some multilibs may be incompatible with these options. @item arm_neonv2_ok -@anchor{arm_neon2_ok} -ARM Target supports @code{-mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp} or compatible +@anchor{arm_neonv2_ok} +ARM Target supports @code{-mfpu=neon-vfpv4 -mfloat-abi=softfp} or compatible options. Some multilibs may be incompatible with these options. @item arm_neon_fp16_ok