From patchwork Mon Sep 10 15:18:08 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Tejas Belagod X-Patchwork-Id: 182908 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9DBF62C0087 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 01:18:30 +1000 (EST) Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1347895111; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received:Received: Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; bh=WDeqKs2 NVxXyrQso1NcnQgAnUbI=; b=EKPGgUD2ptRlLzhtQ+VpRratq6owqKJfpH9N09L 3wIVfVZpus/IhSBRbPaD+0FxPct1mqQ/ZCaKyULVfZaBF/dFJ+m8ZpWBaBXBYmT+ RHf25rZOsxykQMBv/NObCLIYg+7vgnL+liqCtpYvTolt2nNngdmmBaKqwC63aQIS wl6s= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:X-MC-Unique:Content-Type:X-IsSubscribed:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; b=oHVt1T1V9CFgsfetO5FjzKQw88wh1jn4tiUwDmzqKL8dgTUQqnnMCQqIRA8LEI eIHo3ovCKF5Svx56GlSg3DhE6QyNRWtel/DbUxJLIIoqVYExEIDL0n/JlYGvPgnj s3uu41VMIoSzY9XgLJl6Aza3pxMdXN9YlJDts0LJHwgKc=; Received: (qmail 4865 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2012 15:18:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 4856 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Sep 2012 15:18:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, TW_VF X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from service87.mimecast.com (HELO service87.mimecast.com) (91.220.42.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:18:13 +0000 Received: from cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.21]) by service87.mimecast.com; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:18:11 +0100 Received: from [10.1.79.66] ([10.1.255.212]) by cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:18:09 +0100 Message-ID: <504E04B0.9060503@arm.com> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:18:08 +0100 From: Tejas Belagod User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081120) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: [Patch][AArch64] Fix vfmaq_lane_f64. X-MC-Unique: 112091016181107101 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Hi, This patch fixes vfmaq_lane_f64 () AdvSIMD intrinsic. Regression-tested on aarch64-none-elf. OK for aarch64-branch? Thanks, Tejas Belagod. ARM. Changelog: 2012-09-10 Tejas Belagod gcc/ * config/aarch64/arm_neon.h (vfmaq_lane_f64): Fix prototype and assembler template accordingly. diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/arm_neon.h b/gcc/config/aarch64/arm_neon.h index de3a2f2..54eb29c 100644 --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/arm_neon.h +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/arm_neon.h @@ -7859,15 +7859,16 @@ vfmaq_f64 (float64x2_t a, float64x2_t b, float64x2_t c) result; \ }) -#define vfmaq_lane_f64(a, b, c) \ +#define vfmaq_lane_f64(a, b, c, d) \ __extension__ \ ({ \ + float64x2_t c_ = (c); \ float64x2_t b_ = (b); \ float64x2_t a_ = (a); \ float64x2_t result; \ - __asm__ ("fmla %0.2d,%1.2d,%2.d[%3]" \ + __asm__ ("fmla %0.2d,%2.2d,%3.d[%4]" \ : "=w"(result) \ - : "w"(a_), "w"(b_), "i"(c) \ + : "0"(a_), "w"(b_), "w"(c_), "i"(d) \ : /* No clobbers */); \ result; \ })