| Submitter | Igor Mammedov |
|---|---|
| Date | Sept. 7, 2012, 8:54 p.m. |
| Message ID | <1347051311-16122-4-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> |
| Download | mbox | patch |
| Permalink | /patch/182442/ |
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
Comments
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 10:54:52PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> > Acked-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> > --- > target-i386/helper.c | 9 +++++++-- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target-i386/helper.c b/target-i386/helper.c > index 8a5da3d..a0e4c89 100644 > --- a/target-i386/helper.c > +++ b/target-i386/helper.c > @@ -1151,6 +1151,7 @@ X86CPU *cpu_x86_init(const char *cpu_model) > { > X86CPU *cpu; > CPUX86State *env; > + Error *error = NULL; > > cpu = X86_CPU(object_new(TYPE_X86_CPU)); > env = &cpu->env; > @@ -1161,8 +1162,12 @@ X86CPU *cpu_x86_init(const char *cpu_model) > return NULL; > } > > - x86_cpu_realize(OBJECT(cpu), NULL); > - > + x86_cpu_realize(OBJECT(cpu), &error); > + if (error_is_set(&error)) { Can't this be just written as "if (error)"? (Same question as in the previous patch, but as this is new code I would like to clarify what's the recommended style, before ACKing it) > + error_free(error); > + object_delete(OBJECT(cpu)); > + return NULL; > + } > return cpu; > } > > -- > 1.7.11.4 > >
Patch
diff --git a/target-i386/helper.c b/target-i386/helper.c index 8a5da3d..a0e4c89 100644 --- a/target-i386/helper.c +++ b/target-i386/helper.c @@ -1151,6 +1151,7 @@ X86CPU *cpu_x86_init(const char *cpu_model) { X86CPU *cpu; CPUX86State *env; + Error *error = NULL; cpu = X86_CPU(object_new(TYPE_X86_CPU)); env = &cpu->env; @@ -1161,8 +1162,12 @@ X86CPU *cpu_x86_init(const char *cpu_model) return NULL; } - x86_cpu_realize(OBJECT(cpu), NULL); - + x86_cpu_realize(OBJECT(cpu), &error); + if (error_is_set(&error)) { + error_free(error); + object_delete(OBJECT(cpu)); + return NULL; + } return cpu; }