| Message ID | 20120906124705.2631ae01@endymion.delvare |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted, archived |
| Delegated to: | David Miller |
| Headers | show |
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 12:47:05 +0200 > It doesn't seem this spinlock was properly initialized. > > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Applied. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--- linux-3.6-rc4.orig/drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c 2012-07-21 22:58:29.000000000 +0200 +++ linux-3.6-rc4/drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c 2012-09-06 12:40:30.092144722 +0200 @@ -751,6 +751,7 @@ static int __devinit sgiseeq_probe(struc sp->srings = sr; sp->rx_desc = sp->srings->rxvector; sp->tx_desc = sp->srings->txvector; + spin_lock_init(&sp->tx_lock); /* A couple calculations now, saves many cycles later. */ setup_rx_ring(dev, sp->rx_desc, SEEQ_RX_BUFFERS);
It doesn't seem this spinlock was properly initialized. Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> --- I can't even build-test this. drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)