From patchwork Sun Sep 2 15:19:21 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Gerald Pfeifer X-Patchwork-Id: 181186 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF8762C008F for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 01:19:47 +1000 (EST) Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1347203988; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received:Date: From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender: Delivered-To; bh=iSn5FDzP75PlX+7gnAOT9PsWoNo=; b=pALY4n3PUjHz2KR /E8CT7JI4abeYdaAWkayMG6WpYjbEJdT6KTJi8wU+IYhtrZqjj4EyYzINCd1UXBj ZqjysxwtQBmwUEXLuQbQryDMhojGEI8IVQ5Gcpb57iMw8/+o9+7Sqx6qVlHjzGD/ LvKLFhJNSWzjKr68uR9DkWa0ANHE= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:Received:Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-IsSubscribed:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; b=QoAJbbNgv/HCInEwakKJle+zgtoPlrbDnKLk104UiNCtX9oJoTA4VGwTs8GL2G GBSqMaJONQkIg5wCLmsHZMSzHUuKKD8DNMZK7+7mmKLJ4vOSn6Ee+gOw8yFQUVSR ef35lX46/Tv63x829l522ZfkrDaMxT/bD37/cdmZUHLJQ=; Received: (qmail 30074 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2012 15:19:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 30065 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Sep 2012 15:19:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-51.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ainaz.pair.com (HELO ainaz.pair.com) (209.68.2.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 15:19:25 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.129] (vie-188-118-240-184.dsl.sil.at [188.118.240.184]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 187313F419; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 11:19:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 17:19:21 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Nick Clifton cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: Commit: XStormy16: Add support for -fstack-usage In-Reply-To: <87ipd4uph1.fsf@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <87ipd4uph1.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Nick Clifton wrote: > I am checking in the patch below to add support for reporting stack > usage by the XStormy16 backend. This ass a note to our release notes; applied. Anything you'd like to add or tweak? (Is "stormy" fine as an anchor, or should we go for "xstormy" or the full "xstormy16"? I used what we have for the port itself...) Gerald Index: changes.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.8/changes.html,v retrieving revision 1.24 diff -u -3 -p -r1.24 changes.html --- changes.html 29 Aug 2012 19:22:47 -0000 1.24 +++ changes.html 2 Sep 2012 14:35:41 -0000 @@ -293,6 +293,13 @@ by this change.

  • Added optimized instruction scheduling for Niagara4.
    • +

    XStormy16

    + +
      +
    • This target now supports the -fstack-usage + command-line option.
      • +
    +