2012-08-26 Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
PR fortran/41093
* gfortran.h (gfc_common_head): Add "int refs".
* match.c (gfc_match_common): Increment refs.
* resolve.c (resolve_symbol): Only increment formal_ns->refs
if formal_ns is not sym->ns.
* symbol.c (gfc_free_symbol): Only free formal_ns if
if formal_ns is not sym->ns. Free common_block if refs is one.
(gfc_release_symbol): Release formal_ns only if the
symbol is not ENTRY of a module.
* decl.c (get_proc_name): Don't increment gfc_current_ns->refs.
* parse.c (parse_interface): Incement proc_unit->refs++ for
proc-pointer result variables.
PR fortran/54370
* trans-stmt.c (gfc_trans_do_while): Don't change the logical
kind for negation of the condition.
2012-08-26 Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
PR fortran/54370
* gfortran.dg/do_5.f90: New.
@@ -891,7 +891,6 @@ get_proc_name (const char *name, gfc_symbol **result, bool module_fcn_entry)
return rc;
sym = *result;
- gfc_current_ns->refs++;
if (sym && !sym->gfc_new && gfc_current_state () != COMP_INTERFACE)
{
@@ -1266,6 +1266,7 @@ typedef struct gfc_common_head
struct gfc_symbol *head;
const char* binding_label;
int is_bind_c;
+ int refs;
}
gfc_common_head;
@@ -4398,6 +4398,7 @@ gfc_match_common (void)
/* Store a ref to the common block for error checking. */
sym->common_block = t;
+ sym->common_block->refs++;
/* See if we know the current common block is bind(c), and if
so, then see if we can check if the symbol is (which it'll
@@ -3809,7 +3809,8 @@ mio_symbol (gfc_symbol *sym)
if (sym->formal_ns)
{
sym->formal_ns->proc_name = sym;
- sym->refs++;
+ if (sym->formal_ns != sym->ns)
+ sym->refs++;
}
}
@@ -2363,7 +2363,6 @@ parse_interface (void)
gfc_interface_info save;
gfc_state_data s1, s2;
gfc_statement st;
- locus proc_locus;
accept_statement (ST_INTERFACE);
@@ -2452,7 +2451,9 @@ loop:
accept_statement (st);
prog_unit = gfc_new_block;
prog_unit->formal_ns = gfc_current_ns;
- proc_locus = gfc_current_locus;
+ if (prog_unit == prog_unit->formal_ns->proc_name
+ && prog_unit->ns != prog_unit->formal_ns)
+ prog_unit->refs++;
decl:
/* Read data declaration statements. */
@@ -2493,7 +2494,8 @@ decl:
&& strcmp (current_interface.ns->proc_name->name,
prog_unit->name) == 0)
gfc_error ("INTERFACE procedure '%s' at %L has the same name as the "
- "enclosing procedure", prog_unit->name, &proc_locus);
+ "enclosing procedure", prog_unit->name,
+ ¤t_interface.ns->proc_name->declared_at);
goto loop;
@@ -13086,7 +13086,8 @@ resolve_symbol (gfc_symbol *sym)
if (formal)
{
sym->formal_ns = formal->sym->ns;
- sym->formal_ns->refs++;
+ if (sym->ns != formal->sym->ns)
+ sym->formal_ns->refs++;
}
}
@@ -2511,7 +2511,8 @@ gfc_free_symbol (gfc_symbol *sym)
gfc_free_namelist (sym->namelist);
- gfc_free_namespace (sym->formal_ns);
+ if (sym->ns != sym->formal_ns)
+ gfc_free_namespace (sym->formal_ns);
if (!sym->attr.generic_copy)
gfc_free_interface (sym->generic);
@@ -2520,6 +2521,13 @@ gfc_free_symbol (gfc_symbol *sym)
gfc_free_namespace (sym->f2k_derived);
+ if (sym->common_block && sym->common_block->name[0] != '\0')
+ {
+ sym->common_block->refs--;
+ if (sym->common_block->refs == 0)
+ free (sym->common_block);
+ }
+
free (sym);
}
@@ -2532,7 +2540,8 @@ gfc_release_symbol (gfc_symbol *sym)
if (sym == NULL)
return;
- if (sym->formal_ns != NULL && sym->refs == 2)
+ if (sym->formal_ns != NULL && sym->refs == 2 && sym->formal_ns != sym->ns
+ && (!sym->attr.entry || !sym->module))
{
/* As formal_ns contains a reference to sym, delete formal_ns just
before the deletion of sym. */
@@ -1785,7 +1785,7 @@ gfc_trans_do_while (gfc_code * code)
gfc_conv_expr_val (&cond, code->expr1);
gfc_add_block_to_block (&block, &cond.pre);
cond.expr = fold_build1_loc (code->expr1->where.lb->location,
- TRUTH_NOT_EXPR, boolean_type_node, cond.expr);
+ TRUTH_NOT_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (cond.expr), cond.expr);
/* Build "IF (! cond) GOTO exit_label". */
tmp = build1_v (GOTO_EXPR, exit_label);
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+!
+! PR fortran/54370
+!
+! The following program was ICEing at tree-check time
+! "L()" was regarded as default-kind logical.
+!
+! Contributed by Kirill Chilikin
+!
+ MODULE M
+ CONTAINS
+
+ LOGICAL(C_BOOL) FUNCTION L() BIND(C)
+ USE, INTRINSIC :: ISO_C_BINDING
+ L = .FALSE.
+ END FUNCTION
+
+ LOGICAL(8) FUNCTION L2() BIND(C)
+ L2 = .FALSE._8
+ END FUNCTION
+
+ SUBROUTINE S()
+ DO WHILE (L())
+ ENDDO
+ DO WHILE (L2())
+ ENDDO
+ END
+
+ END
This patch fixes one ICE and several memory leaks. But there are more. ********************* The patch with symbol.c and resolve.c fixes the following issue: gfortran leaks memory for: REAL FUNCTION GGL(ds) GGL = 16806.D0 END The problem is the following code in resolve_symbol: /* Make sure the formal namespace is present. */ if (sym->formal && !sym->formal_ns) ... if (formal) { sym->formal_ns = formal->sym->ns; sym->formal_ns->refs++; } Thus, there are now two references to the same namespace. At the end, the memory is freed via gfc_symbol_done_2, which calls gfc_free_namespace (gfc_current_ns). In the latter, one has: ns->refs--; if (ns->refs > 0) return; free_sym_tree (ns->sym_root); and the latter frees the formal namespace. The problem is that "ns->ref == 2" won't get decreased. That's fixed by the first patch. * * * A similar issue existed for the CONTAINS leakage, which was mentioned the other day. Here, the problem is the increment in get_proc_name. However, a simple patch with the sym->refs++ in decl.c and symbol.c's special case for ENTRY wasn't sufficient as gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_result_1.f90 failed. I have now added some extra code to parse. to handle "ppr@". (If one uses valgrind on gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_result_1.f90 it leaks some gfc_symbol memory; however, the problems seem to be unrelated.) * * * gfortran didn't free gfc_common_head; I added a refs and free it now. (For blank commons, no special code is needed as ns->common_head is not a pointer.) * * * TODO: Despite my hopes for previous patch, there is at least one gfc_ss leak left (for channel.f90): ==12987== by 0xE6A7A8: xcalloc (xmalloc.c:162) ==12987== by 0x6074A3: gfc_get_array_ss(gfc_ss*, gfc_expr*, int, gfc_ss_type) (trans-array.c:561) ==12987== by 0x613870: gfc_walk_expr(gfc_expr*) (trans-array.c:8787) ==12987== by 0x63A908: gfc_trans_arrayfunc_assign(gfc_expr*, gfc_expr*) (trans-expr.c:6749) ==12987== by 0x63C281: gfc_trans_assignment(gfc_expr*, gfc_expr*, bool, bool) (trans-expr.c:7438) ==12987== by 0x602C31: trans_code(gfc_code*, tree_node*) (trans.c:1312) ==12987== by 0x65ED66: gfc_trans_do(gfc_code*, tree_node*) (trans-stmt.c:1395) TODO: There are some more failures, e.g. fatigue.f90 shows invalid reads ==13021== at 0x57C718: _ZL10show_locusP5locusii.isra.3 (error.c:392) ==13021== by 0x57CD55: error_print(char const*, char const*, __va_list_tag*) (error.c:661) ==13021== by 0x57D878: gfc_error(char const*, ...) (error.c:956) ==13021== by 0x5C3C16: match_complex_part(gfc_expr**) (primary.c:1205) ==13021== by 0x5C3DE6: gfc_match_literal_constant(gfc_expr**, int) (primary.c:1296) and memory leakage in ==13021== by 0xE6A7A8: xcalloc (xmalloc.c:162) ==13021== by 0x5F0077: gfc_new_symbol(char const*, gfc_namespace*) (symbol.c:2569) ==13021== by 0x5B5A75: read_module() (module.c:4698) ==13021== by 0x5B5E5B: gfc_use_module(gfc_use_list*) (module.c:6147) ==13021== by 0x5B7233: gfc_use_modules() (module.c:6270) ==13021== by 0x5BC147: use_modules() (parse.c:88) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The trans-stmt.c patch fixes a tree-check ICE as we mix different logical types; I decided to use the previous type instead folding to the boolean_type_node. Do you think it makes sense to backport it to 4.6/4.7? * * * Build and regtested on x86-64-linux. OK for the trunk? Tobias PS: I wonder why gfortran.dg/interface_3.f90 passed before, given that "proc_locus" wasn't set before. I also wonder why my patch causes the test case to segfault. Well, at least that bug is now also fixed.