From patchwork Sun Aug 26 00:28:33 2012
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Patchwork-Submitter: Gerald Pfeifer
X-Patchwork-Id: 180010
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org
Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org
Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131])
by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 840BA2C00D8
for ;
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 10:28:45 +1000 (EST)
Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1346545726; h=Comment:
DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received:Date:
From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:
MIME-Version:Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:
List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:
Delivered-To; bh=rhcny80W/1yamL9kD8NI0b9ooik=; b=qLeT6Q3dQ79xi96
RwMRPN9rjZD4JfpMfBVoAhICF7h4laIzMdBldaufzuII2LK9OuXVnQJlZBhXrGZN
mgxClSZiaZFD23UQrkwhwavz3zDf6WJ5AAH46n9NHvU6e+igE7ZqA0e9I0mNi1vP
ROi5jvZRus82A1P8MHO7rTv1P44c=
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org;
h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:Received:Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-IsSubscribed:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To;
b=CLCtau9gyNwR0WJK4xIQ6XWX5+OJxhCrkX4b5oyfeZ3x2fY1E4Z3ne29t/XduZ
e/tD5TvjfSi9qJ+6MgRO/0WDHUJf8XbTwnpVALlyKKsHP53qykCnyfmsT0TUjG5O
LmAGqd7iisLtxYcaGe/a6+TAQ7+cJyBMi70xdGVG0uulA=;
Received: (qmail 19882 invoked by alias); 26 Aug 2012 00:28:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 19874 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Aug 2012 00:28:42 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-51.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00,
KHOP_THREADED
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from ainaz.pair.com (HELO ainaz.pair.com) (209.68.2.66) by
sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP;
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 00:28:30 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.129] (vie-188-118-248-247.dsl.sil.at
[188.118.248.247]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA
id 49C733F40F; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 20:28:28 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 02:28:33 +0200 (CEST)
From: Gerald Pfeifer
To: Dodji Seketeli
cc: GCC Patches , Tom Tromey ,
Jason Merrill ,
Gabriel Dos Reis ,
Laurynas Biveinis ,
Benjamin De Kosnik
Subject: Re: Patches to enable -ftrack-macro-expansion by default
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
References:
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> I have finally applied this series of 14 patches to the mainline today.
> The SVN revisions are from r186965 to r186978.
Shouldn't we document this in the release notes?
What do you guys think about the following? Suggestions welcome.
Gerald
Index: changes.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.8/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -3 -p -r1.17 changes.html
--- changes.html 20 Aug 2012 12:23:39 -0000 1.17
+++ changes.html 26 Aug 2012 00:27:32 -0000
@@ -56,9 +56,14 @@ by this change.
-->
-
+
+
+ - The option
-ftrack-macro-expansion=2
is now
+ enabled by default. This allows the compiler to emit diagnostic
+ about the current macro expansion stack when a compilation error
+ occurs.
+