From patchwork Fri Aug 3 14:01:41 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: JonY X-Patchwork-Id: 174993 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BDBE42C0091 for ; Sat, 4 Aug 2012 00:02:27 +1000 (EST) Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1344607349; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received:Received: Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; bh=yJCyjhm fmDizXgJWUiBuYOtGePE=; b=mZPG1VnabVPLU7yA/WcpAc2mWM7gvNjXzt1U/yG KSyy/BJSaNoof4Eyr22iXrh4f3AZEkAMxeyUyLckMIoycwaQXH1hXPM/q+CbLP/F /bGuk/hnwK5Z+bcLSKRJrMmu1hvM7kZH88j22ir3OboZrdFaVNdUmhBh/WKjT4mv upro= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:Received:Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:X-IsSubscribed:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; b=QpnZtFTuuqPMJZVUHRFZk1HTAT2u5ZjPx6Ysdc+nl1rxyyA0wMdgHrdGJvOjV2 yPDiV8ZDnHj3ark1SjiT3xHCajTUPjXvuL+lp/WcKOszpOxedzkWnY08kraGAy5U 1gtc1VbTLGm4DZWnjoHzvs8CdUkRIqJCHRgZdzswEpQg4=; Received: (qmail 2916 invoked by alias); 3 Aug 2012 14:02:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 2908 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Aug 2012 14:02:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM, KHOP_PGP_SIGNED, KHOP_RCVD_TRUST, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 14:02:04 +0000 Received: by obcva7 with SMTP id va7so1153017obc.20 for ; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 07:02:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.218.37 with SMTP id pd5mr5060944obc.24.1344002523835; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 07:02:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [219.92.175.163] (swz-175-163.tm.net.my. [219.92.175.163]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ac8sm9741497obc.11.2012.08.03.07.02.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 03 Aug 2012 07:02:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <501BD9C5.9060106@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 22:01:41 +0800 From: JonY User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gcc Patch List Subject: [PATCH] Fix libgcc version for Canadian cross compile X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Hi, For correctness sake, determine version from BASE-VER file instead of calling compiler. This allows better toleration with bad Canadian cross setups where host gcc version is of different version from target. Patch OK? Index: gcc-trunk/libgcc/Makefile.in =================================================================== --- gcc-trunk/libgcc/Makefile.in (revision 190125) +++ gcc-trunk/libgcc/Makefile.in (working copy) @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ export toolexecdir export toolexeclibdir -version := $(shell $(CC) -dumpversion) +version := $(shell cat $(top_srcdir)/../gcc/BASE-VER) ifeq ($(decimal_float),yes) ifeq ($(enable_decimal_float),bid)